Skip to content

Virtual Reality Therapy for patients admitted to Intensive Care Units

Comparison between three physiotherapeutic protocols in patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit: Conventional Physiotherapy, Non-Immersive Virtual Reality Therapy and Combined Therapy

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-3yrrhns
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2024-11-04
Start date
2019-08-14
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Immobilization

Interventions

This is a prospective, interventional, clinical study, randomized into three groups: conventional physiotherapy (40 patients), virtual reality therapy (40 patients) and combined therapy (40 patients),
L01.224.160.875

Sponsors

Universidade Federal de Alfenas
Lead Sponsor
Universidade Federal de Alfenas
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 60 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients who had been hospitalized since the day before the start of the protocol; with hemodynamic stability; age between 18 and 60 years; both sexes; with preserved sensitivity and cognitive abilities

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients belonging to the group of vulnerable people, such as: pregnant women, institutionalized or indigenous people; patients who received systemic corticosteroids or neuromuscular blockers for more than 5 days were not included due to neuromuscular weakness caused by the medications

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Outcome observed: improvement in inspiratory muscle strength observed in the Conventional Therapy and Combined Therapy groups and improvement in expiratory muscle strength in the Combined Therapy group; improvement in peak expiratory flow and peak cough flow in the Combined Therapy group; in relation to the performance demonstrated based on the percentage generated by the game and the average time in seconds, an improvement was noted in the Combined Therapy group and safety was also observed in carrying out the protocols applied, as the variables of vital signs and sensation of dyspnea according to the Scale Modified Borg tests remained within physiological parameters;Expected outcome: it is expected to improve global and respiratory muscle strength, degree of bronchial obstruction, lung volumes and capacities, functional independence, range of movement, upper limb functionality, sleep quality and balance

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
No secondary outcomes are expected

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactFabiana Della Via

Hospital e Maternidade Galileo

fabianadv@yahoo.com.br+55(19)2115-2000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)