Skip to content

Endodontic treatment versus retreatment: inflammatory and microbiological evaluation, before during and after 18 months of treatment

Primary versus secondary endodontic infection: inflammatory and lipid profile, microbial profile, endotoxin and LTA levels before and during endodontic therapy and success after 18 months of treatment

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-3xbnnn
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2018-07-17
Start date
2017-07-12
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Pulp Diseases

Interventions

Group 1 Number of participants: 15 Procedures performed: Endodontic treatment Medication: Calcium hydroxide P.A. with serum Availability: In stock Medication time: 14 days Method of administration: in
Drug
Procedure/surgery
E06.397.778

Sponsors

Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho - Campus São José dos Campos
Lead Sponsor
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
Collaborator

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients in adulthood; Need for endodontic treatment; Permanent teeth with primary endodontic infection; Unirradicular; Presence of a single canal and periapical lesion; Absence of periodontal pockets greater than 4 mm; No mobility.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Teeth that can't be insulated with the rubber dam; With root fracture; Exposure of the pulp chamber; Patients who have used antibiotics or antifungals in the last 3 months; Patients with systemic disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Expected outcome 1: Increased release of local lipid mediators (RvE1, RvD2 and LxA4) with resolution or significant reduction of the periapical inflammatory process, verified by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method, which allows detecting amounts of protein of nanograms (10-9 g) from the observation of a variation of at least 5% in the pre- and post-intervention measurements;Expected outcome 2: detection and quantification of lipoteichoic acid (LTA), verified by means of the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method, which allows the detection of protein amounts of nanograms (10-9 g) from a variation of at least 5% in the pre- and post-intervention measurements

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Expected outcome 3: Reduction of the number of bacteria present in the root canals in teeth of patients with apical periodontitis compared to biomechanical post-preparation values and intracanal medication, made by counting Colony Forming Units (CFU / ml);Expected outcome 4: Reduction in endotoxin levels by means of the Chromokinetic Test of Limulus Amebocyte Lysates (KQCL) compared to the initial values from the observation of a variation of at least 5% in the pre and post intervention measurements;Expected outcome 5: Evaluation of the volume of the initial periapical lesions and after 18 months of treatment by Cone-Beam Computed Tomography. It is expected to find lower lesion regression in cases with higher endotoxin indices

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactBruna Jordão Motta Corazza

Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho - Campus São José dos Campos

brunajordao1991@gmail.com+55-012-991512822

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 17, 2026