Skip to content

A comparative study between two surgeries for women with Stress Urinary Leakage: Minisling (Solyx) and Transobturator Sling (Obtryx II)

Randomized controlled trial between Minisling (Solyx) vs Transobturator Sling (Obtryx II) in women with Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-3vcqt9
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2018-01-15
Start date
2017-12-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non-specified urinary incontinence

Interventions

One hundred women will be submitted to a gynecological exam and will be randomized in two groups: 50 for minisling (Solyx) and 50 for transobturator sling (Obtryx II). It will be collected hemoglobin
Procedure/surgery

Sponsors

Hospital da Mulher José Aristodemo Pinotti
Lead Sponsor
Boston Scientific
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Women with 18 years and/or older. Positive cough stress test for SUI or positive findings of stress urinary incontinence at urodynamic study (UDS). Post-voiding residue < 100 ml or less 20% of total urinary volume Maximum bladder capacity over 300 ml

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Women with overactive bladder or recurrent UTI or previous urogynecological surgeries. Previous pelvic radiotherapy. Presence of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) stage 2 and over. Past or recent history of bladder lithiasis, inferior urinary fistula or diverticulum. Current use of anticoagulants. Previous surgical history of foreign-body reaction like (eg. history of surgery with prosthetic complications).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Primary outcome 1 Subjective cure: assessment by the improvement in quality of life using PGI-I and KHQ, and presented with absolute scores. There is not a standardization regarding the score mean difference and it is not expected a difference between the groups. They will be measured with 6 and 12 months.;Primary outcome 2 Objective cure (Valsalva´s maneuver) in 6, 12 months: assessment of SUI after 3,6 and 12 months of surgical procedure according to the urodynamic study and categorized in yes or no. It is expected an efficacy rate of 60-80% in both groups, with no difference between them.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary outcome 10 Thigh pain, defined by the patient a pain in the medial perineal area next in the thigh, categorized into yes or no. It is expected a higher rate of thigh pain in the transobturator group.Assessed at 6 and 12-month postoperative follow-up.;Secondary outcome 11 De novo urgency - a non-expected and quick desire to void that started after the surgery and categorized into yes or no. It is expected a low rate (<1%)with no difference between the groups.Assessed at 6 and 12-month postoperative follow-up.;Secondary outcome 1 Relapse: return of the complaint of urinary incontinence verified after Valsalva maneuver and categorized into yes or no. It is expected a 10% relapse rate in 12 months with no difference between both groups. Assessed at 6 and 12-month postoperative follow-up.;Secondary outcome 2 Pain scale (VAS) - graduates pain in immediate postoperative period - varies from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain). It is expected a higher VAS for the minisling group.;Secondary outcome 3 Intraoperative bleeding, quantified by the difference between final and initial hemoglobin levels, expressed in absolute values. It is not expected a difference between pre and post op values, neither a difference between groups.;Secondary outcome 4 Need for transfusion, defined as the use of erithrocytes during intraoperative period and categorized in yes or no. It is expected a low rate (<1%)with no difference between the groups.;Secondary outcome 5 Organ lesion (bladder, intestinal or vascular), categorized into yes or no, by physical or imaging exam during ntra and postoperative period. It is expected a low rate (<1%)with no difference between the groups.;Secondary outcome 6 Acute urinary retention, defined as the impossibility to urinate spontaneously after surgery and categorized into yes or no until 15 days after surgery. It is expected a low rate (<10 %)with no difference between the groups.;Secondary outcome 7 Mesh erosion - presence of a dehiscence are

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactLuiz Gustavo Brito

Hospital da Mulher José Aristodemo Pinotti

lgobrito@gmail.com+55-019-35219595

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)