FindTrial
Sign In

Use of a list of recorded words to analyze speech comprehension in children using cochlear implants

Use of the list of recorded words for evaluation of speech perception in children using cochlear implants

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-3jhb3t
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2019-04-15
Start date
2017-08-19
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Study conducted in children with normal hearing and oral language belonging to the control group. People with hearing loss

Interventions

E01.370.382.375.060
A cross-sectional clinical study in specific phases, described below. 1. Recording of the "List of words as a perception evaluation procedure of the speech sounds for hearing impaired children "in the
G2 - six years to six years and 11 months
G3 - seven years to seven years and 11 months
G4 - eight years to eight years and 11 months
G5 - nine years to nine years and 11 months and G6 - 10 years to 10 years and 11 months. 3. Application of the recorded word list and voice over in children with typical hearing and language developme
Other
F02.830.816.263
N03.540.828.105
F04.711.513.240

Sponsors

Hospital de Reabilitação de Anomalias Craniofaciais - HRAC/USP
Lead Sponsor
Universidade de São Paulo - USP
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
5 Years to 10 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Healthy children; both genders; age between five years to 10 years and 11 months; with typical hearing and language development

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Children with hearing impairment and oral language disorders or other associated comorbidities were excluded from the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
It is expected that the presentation of the list of recorded words will be more viable and with more hits than the list of words presented in the open voice;Recording the list as a procedure for evaluating speech perception showed to be feasible for application in the studied population. It was verified in the results of the test that the medians obtained in both conditions (live and recorded) were the same or close, both in silence and in noise, since most of the 30 children who composed the sample reached 100% recognition of phonemes and words. Even with this result, the difference between conditions was statistically significant. This finding is justified by the fact that, in the recorded situation, the majority of the children presented performance equal to 100%, whereas in the live voice condition, many children had results below 100%.—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary outcomes are not expected—

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactNatalia Frederigue-Lopes

Universidade de São Paulo - USP

nathalia@frederigue.com.br+55-01432358204

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)