Skip to content

Treatment with Oral Breathing Exercises

Interdisciplinary approach of mouth breathers: use of Isostreching in treating respiratory and postural Techniques and Orofacials

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-3h3x44
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2014-11-17
Start date
2012-05-07
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Oral breathing

Interventions

20 youth will be evaluated with a minimum age of six years and maximum 20 years for inclusion of both sexes. This single-arm clinical trial will be by simple randomization. Biweekly group sessions wil
Other
E02.779.483.750
E02.190.525.186

Sponsors

Universidade Federal de Alfenas- UNIFAL-MG
Lead Sponsor
Secretaria de Saúde da prefeitura Municipal de Alfenas
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
6 Years to 20 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Young people with clinical diagnosis of dental and oral breathing; both genders; aged 6 to 20 years; with consent of parents or guardians for participation in this study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Young people with neurological problems; with heart problems, with agenesis of lower limbs

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
There is a decrease in postural asymmetries in the group evaluated after treatment with isostretching, which are measured by photogrammetry with photos in anterior and posterior frontal plane is expected. The absence of asymmetry was used as normal parameter (BRICOT 2001; KENDALL, McCreary and Provance, 1995). There was no training control group no comparison between groups is possible.;There was improvement in body asymmetry, especially in the sternoclavicular joint and posterior superior iliac spine.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Causing increased respiratory flow and respiratory pressure measured by the peak flow and manuovacuometro respectively, after treatment with isostretching is expected. Will be used as a parameter for the normal respiratory pressures (Wilson et al, 1984; Gautier and Zinman, 1983) and the Peak Flow (Godfrey et al, 1970) predicted equations that take into account gender, age and height of the child. The values ??found are confrontadoe with reference and those that were higher than 80% predicted Peak flow and 60% of presdito for respiratory pressures are considered normal.;There was improvement in maximal expiratory pressure and peak flow.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactDenise Iunes

Universidade Federal de Alfenas- UNIFAL-MG

deniseiunes@unifal-mg.edu.br+55(35)3292-1515

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)