dental cavity
Conditions
Interventions
Randomization
Operators will not be blind to the procedures that will be performed. Groups will be drawn. Each restorative group will be identified with a number that will be placed in an envelope, an
Procedure/surgery
E06.323.428
Sponsors
Financiamento Próprio
Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade Estadual Paulista - Campus de Araçatuba ( Centro Coordenador)
Eligibility
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Age from 18 years, regardless of gender; good health, no medical history of allergies to dental products and medicines; Presence of at least 3 posterior teeth (pre-molars and / or molars independently of their location in the dental arch) with a need for restoration, of different etiologies (dental caries, need for replacement or replacement of old restorations due to secondary caries, fracture or Aesthetic reasons) involving the occlusal face and at least one proximal face; Presence of teeth that are antagonistic to the study, provided they are not restored with porcelain; Presence of the adjacent tooth in contact with the proximal face to be evaluated by the study. The teeth analyzed in this study should present cavities whose depths are classified as medium or deep, absence of periapical changes or endodontic treatment.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Pregnant or lactating women; Occlusal disorders or temporomandibular joint dysfunction (TMD); Patients who are undergoing continuous treatment and use of analgesics or anti-inflammatory drugs; Continuous use of desensitizing agents or fluorine; Active and untreated periodontal disease; Dental mobility; Use of orthodontic appliances; History of anterior tooth sensitivity.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| It is expected that there is no difference between the three restorative strategies used in the evaluated times, in relation to postoperative sensitivity, clinical performance and proximal contact. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| It is expected that there is no difference between the evaluated times, when the same restorative strategy is evaluated, in relation to postoperative sensitivity, clinical performance and proximal contact. | — |
Countries
Brazil
Contacts
Public ContactAndré Bertoz
Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade Estadual Paulista Campus de Araçatuba
Outcome results
None listed