Skip to content

Comparison of the results of non-surgical treatments of clavicle fractures using a sling or immobilizer in eight

Conservative treatment of mid-shaft clavicle fractures, arm sling versus figure-of-eight immobilization. Randomized controlled trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-3g6dbt8
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2023-04-14
Start date
2023-05-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Clavicle fractures

Interventions

The present study should contain 50 individuals in each of the groups. Considering a 10% loss to follow-up during one year of follow-up, we will include 110 patients in the study. Randomization: After

Sponsors

Fundação Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto
Lead Sponsor
Fundação Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Volunteers with acute midshaft clavicle fractures (up to 10 days after the trauma); adults between 18 and 65 years old; no medical contraindications for the proposed treatments; acceptance and understanding of the informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with proximal or distal clavicle fractures, fracture with deviation or shortening greater than 2 cm between the bone fragments in at least one of the radiographic views (AP or Zanca); pathological fracture; open fracture; associated neurovascular injury diagnosed on physical examination; head trauma (Glasgow <12); fracture and/or dislocations in the ipsilateral upper limb; previous diseases in the affected limb that may influence the results; inability to maintain outpatient clinical follow-up

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
It is expected to find similar results between the proposed treatment methods when evaluating the function of the upper limb affected by the fracture analyzed through the DASH questionnaire (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
For the evaluation of fracture consolidation, radiographs will be used and treatment failure will be considered when there is non-union with the need to change treatment to surgery.;Adverse effects such as clavicle deformities and asymptomatic non-union will also be analyzed.;Function of the limb affected by the fracture, this outcome will be analyzed through the application of a questionnaire such as the UCLA (Modified University of California at Los Angeles);Quality of life evaluated through of the SF-12 questionnaire (Short Form). ;Time required for participants to return to their usual activities after treatment.;The pain assessed using the visual analogue pain scale.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactOreste Lemos Carrazzone

Fundação Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto

dr.oreste@hotmail.com+55(17)32015000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)