Skip to content

Clinical performance of two glass ionomer cements used as restorative materials in Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (dental restorations)

Clinical evaluation of glass ionomer cements used in Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-3bbwwjz
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2023-07-24
Start date
2013-06-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Caries

Interventions

After initial clinical evaluation, a total of 34 participants aged 10 to 15 years with at least one of the upper and/or lower permanent molars with cavitated dentin occlusal caries lesion were selecte

Sponsors

Universidade Federal do Ceará
Lead Sponsor
Universidade Federal do Ceará
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
10 Years to 15 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Children and adolescents in good general health; aged between 10 and 15 years; both sexes; residents of the municipality of Sobral; present a collaborative behavior to carry out the clinical procedure; present at least one of the upper and/or lower permanent molars with cavitated dentin occlusal caries lesion accessible to manual instruments with a minimum opening of 0.9 mm; present the Informed Consent Term signed by the parents/guardians

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Permanent molars with pulp exposure; fistula; abscess; pathological mobility; spontaneous pain; carious dentin lesion not accessible to hand instruments

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Outcome expected 1: To evaluate the performance and clinical longevity of ART restorations in occlusal cavities of permanent molars with two different glass ionomer cements(Ketac Molar Easy Mix and Vitro Molar). The restorations were evaluated after 6, 12 and 48 months according to ART (Atraumatic Restorative Treatment) and USPHS (United States Public Health Service) criteria.;Outcome found 1: There was no significant difference in relation to the clinical performance of ART restorations performed with the different glass ionomer cements tested, when compared to each other and when evaluated in the different study periods.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
No secondary outcomes expected

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactMário Moreira

Universidade Federal do Ceará

mario@sobral.ufc.br+55 88 3695-4622

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)