FindTrial
Sign In

Evaluation of the use of sodium hypochlorite in the tooth before bonding orthodontic appliances

Evaluation of the influence of enamel deproteinization on the adhesion of orthodontic accessories

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-39ntmjk
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2021-03-29
Start date
2021-05-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Malocclusion

Interventions

The sample of 40 patients who would already undergo fixed orthodontic treatment, will be divided into two groups according to the adhesive used. Group 1: Transbond XT (n = 20), Group 2: Orthocem (n =
E06.658.453

Sponsors

Centro Universitário Ingá / UNINGÁ
Lead Sponsor
Centro Universitário Ingá / UNINGÁ
Collaborator

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with indication for fixed orthodontic treatment without tooth extractions. Complete permanent dentition in the maxillary arch until first molars (10 teeth) present, erupted, absent from caries, erosion, friction, attrition, abrasion, enamel hypoplasia, imperfect amelogenesis, without restorations, or anomalies in the vestibular surfaces;

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Not applicable

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
It is expected to find out if the use of hypochlorite really increases or not the adhesion of orthodontic accessories, if it increases, it will be a new tool to improve the quality of the bonding of these accessories in the orthodontist's clinical routine—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Compare the two adhesives, Transbond XT and Orthocem, regarding their clinical effectiveness in adhesive resistance—

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactRenan Peloso
renan_peloso@hotmail.com+55-44-999911116

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 13, 2026