Skip to content

Root Canal Treatment versus Partial Pulp Removal in teeth with formed roots and Symptomatic Irriversible Pulpitis

Pulpotomy versus Endodontic Treatment in teeth diagnosed with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis and complete rhizogenesis: a randomized clinical trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-372zgsp
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2024-11-21
Start date
2023-09-13
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pulpitis

Interventions

This is a longitudinal prospective clinical trial lasting 12 to 24 months per participant, parallel randomized control group design followed by prospective meta-analysis, which will involve 120 adult
Total pulpotomy (PT, n=60) and Endodontic treatment (TE, n=60). This clinical study randomized trial will compare two treatment modalities: conventional endodontic treatment (TE) and total pulpotomy (
E06.397

Sponsors

Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba-Universidade Estadual de Campinas
Lead Sponsor
Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba-Universidade Estadual de Campinas
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients aged 18 years and over; both genders; with a permanent tooth with complete rhizogenesis with deep cavities/restorations and symptoms indicative of irreversible symptomatic pulpitis (moderate to severe persistent spontaneous pain); the tooth must respond to the sensitivity to cold and electrical testing; must be restorable and can be rubber dam isolated adequately

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Teeth with active periodontal disease (pocket depth >5mm); teeth indicated for elective endodontic treatment for restorative purposes; teeth with apical periodontitis; systemically compromised patients or who have undergone radiotherapy; patients unable to consent; history of trauma to the tooth; pregnant or postpartum patients; teeth with any evidence of purulence or excessive bleeding that cannot be controlled with a cotton ball with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite for 10 minutes

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary outcome is based on clinical analysis after 12 months evaluating factors such as: 1) absence of pain indicative of symptomatic irreversible pulpitis; 2) absence of signs and symptoms indicative of acute or chronic apical periodontitis; 3) absence of radiographic evidence of failure, including radiolucency or resorption.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary outcomes will be based on the report of postoperative pain through a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and use of analgesics in the postoperative period (24h, 48h, 72h and 7 days). The presence of a tooth with an intact restoration and no defects after 12 months. Answer from positive sensitivity in the electrical test for the total pulpotomy group. Absence of need for any additional intervention or adverse event (such as the appearance of signs and symptoms that require an additional consultation or treatment, in addition to the already scheduled follow-up consultations) reported during the 12-month follow-up period;The microbiota and its virulence factors are expected to be evaluated using Nested-PCR, Checkerboard, next-generation sequencing, LPS, and LTA methods. We will observe if there was a decrease in the microorganisms and their virulence factors after several stages of the treatment;It is expected to identify the host immune response using ELISA and multiplex assays after the various stages of treatment

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactBrenda Gomes

Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba-Universidade Estadual de Campinas

bpgomes@fop.unicamp.br+551921065391

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)