Skip to content

Interference of Tetanus Stimulation in Monitoring Muscle Relaxation with Rocuronium in General Anesthesia

Effect of Tetanic Stimulation prior to Train-of-Four on Muscle Response Stabilization Time in patients 60 to 80 years

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-35msdt
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2020-03-31
Start date
2020-01-21
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neuromuscular block

Interventions

Intervention group: the tetanus stimulus with 50 Hz will be used in 20 patients aged 60 to 80 years undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia to decrease the stabilization time of the muscl
Device

Sponsors

Hospital Universitário Gaffrée e Guinle- Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
Lead Sponsor
Hospital Universitário Gaffrée e Guinle- Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
60 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: both genders;age 60 to 80 years;physical state American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I to III;body mass index 18.5 to 29;surgeries lasting 60 minutes or more;patients who will undergo surgery with a single dose of neuromuscular blocking drug

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: refusal to participate in the study;presence of neuromuscular diseases, renal or hepatic dysfunction;history of difficult airway predictors;use of furosemide, aminoglycosides, aminophylline, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, anti-inflammatories and magnesium;allergy to the drugs used in the study;intercurrences in the perioperative that need alteration in the project;participants who already participate in other clinical studies within the study hospital

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Evaluate the interference of the tetanus stimulus used to stabilize the neuromuscular monitor signal in the time of recovery from the neuromuscular block verified by the relationship between the fourth stimulus and the neuromuscular monitor on the first stimulus (T4/T1), that translate muscle contraction and the degree of reversal of neuromuscular block

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Evaluate the initial and final height of the first stimuli (T1), the time to obtain stability of the height of T1 and the adjustments of the neuromuscular monitor ;Evaluate the recovery time of the train-of-four (TOF) 0.9 normalized and the recovery time of the train-of-four stimuli (TOF) 1.0 normalized;Evaluate the safety in extubating the patient ensuring recovery from neuromuscular block, translated in the train-of-four(TOF) above 0.9 to the monitor

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactAngela ;Ismar Ribeiro;Cavalcanti

Angela Henrique Silva Ribeiro;Hospital Universitário Gaffrée e Guinle- Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro

angelah@terra.com.br;ismarcavalcanti@gmail.com2122645822;+55-21-22644742

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)