Skip to content

Comparing the treatment of Vulvar Condyloma, using two techniques: Laser and Electric.

Vulvar Acuminate Condyloma treatment: comparing surgical techniques using Diodo laser and Electrocaterization

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-32g9wck
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2021-11-12
Start date
2020-10-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Condylomata Acuminata

Interventions

Group treated with electrocautery: 30 women with vulvar condyloma, selected (randomized), will be treated using an electric scalpel, with local anesthesia or raque anesthesia. The removal of all or pa
E02.594

Sponsors

Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
Lead Sponsor
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Volunteers; female. Attended in the gynecology outpatient with a clinical diagnosis (physical exam) of vulvar condyloma acuminata.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Volunteers suspected of having high-grade vulvar intraepithial lesion after physical exam. Volunteers suspected of vulvar cancer after physical exam. Volunteers diagnosed with Buschke-Löeenstein tumor. Volunteers with contraindication to locoregional or general anesthesia.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
We hope to evaluate the healing of condylomatous lesions, by the two techniques used, when we will observe, over a period of 6 months, through physical examination of the patients, whether the lesions healed, whether there was pain in the postoperative period, the presence of scars and the time of return of injuries, when it occurs

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary outcomes are not expected

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactJoão Seixas
jalseixas@gmail.com5521999754345

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)