FindTrial
Sign In

Randomized comparative study of double J catheter with reduced tip vs conventional double J catheter (normal tip)

Randomized comparative study of customized double J loop catheter X convencional double J catheter

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-32592zd
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2023-11-13
Start date
2023-12-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ureteral Obstruction

Interventions

Comparison between conventional double J catheter and modified double J catheter with extraction of the bladder tip to assess patient discomfort, including 100 cases of each type of catheter, previous
E.07.132.625

Sponsors

Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Santos
Lead Sponsor
Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Santos
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients of both genders; at least 18 years old; indicated for a double J catheter, regardless of the study; who understand and accept informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients who do not agree to participate; those under 18 years of age; those with a urinary catheter at the time of the intervention or less than 6 months ago; those with neurological diseases or those using antidepressants; bilateral catheters; those with malignant disease; active infection; ureter injury greater than 2 on the Traxer scale; antegrade double J; patients with chronic pain and pelvic radiotherapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Through the use of a standardized questionnaire to evaluate symptoms related to double J catheter implantation (USSQ), it is expected to verify that reducing the amount of material in the bladder end significantly reduces the symptoms of dysuria, urinary frequency and hematuria, allowing better tolerance to the double J catheter with the adaptations made—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
No secondary outcomes are expected.—

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactAlessandro Vengjer

Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Santos

alvengjer@uol.com.br+55(13)32020600

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)