Skip to content

Pain during filling using Tagger's Hybrid Technique in Endodontic Treatments

Pain during filling using Tagger's Hybrid Technique in Endodontic Treatments of necroses teeth in a single session, considering in association demographic data, dental group, periradicular status, treatment time and extravasation of filling cement

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-2ymnqrr
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2024-04-17
Start date
2023-05-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Pulp Necrosis

Interventions

The study sample will be composed of 151 patients with asymptomatic necrotic teeth with or without periapical lesions visualized radiographically, referred for endodontic treatments at the Center for

Sponsors

Associação Paranaense de Cultura - APC
Lead Sponsor
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with asymptomatic necrotic teeth with or without periapical lesions visualized radiographically, referred for endodontic treatments at the Dental Specialties Center of the Municipality of Navegantes – CEO/Navegantes – between the months of May 2023 to August 2023, after coronary access carried out in Basic Health Units (UBSs) through the use of spherical drills. 1014 or 1016, later using Tricresolformalin as an indwelling dressing. Age equal to or greater than 18 years old. Both genders

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with coronary and/or root perforations; periodontal involvement; spontaneous and/or acute or moderate painful symptoms upon percussion

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Outcome found 06: There was no significant relationship with the intensity of pain during filling using the Tagger Hybrid Technique in endodontic treatments of necrotic teeth in a single session, considering demographic data, dental group, periradicular status, treatment time and cement extravasation shutter.;Expected outcome 01: No statistically significant difference in pain intensity in relation to gender, male and female.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Outcome found 01: There was no statistically significant difference in pain intensity in relation to gender, the sample consisted of 68 males and 83 females. Dependent variable - pain intensity (ordinal scale). Non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test for independent samples (p > 0.05).;Outcome found 02: There was no statistically significant difference in the intensity of pain in relation to the tooth, sample composed of 11 upper canines, 05 lower central incisors, 15 upper central incisors, 03 lower lateral incisors, 09 upper lateral incisors, 20 lower first molars, 14 upper first molars , 06 lower first premolar, 13 upper first premolar, 08 lower second molar, 04 upper second molar, 18 lower second premolar, 24 upper second premolar. Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test for independent samples (p > 0.05).;Outcome found 03: There was no statistically significant difference in pain intensity in relation to periradicular status, a sample consisting of 111 with injuries and 40 without injuries. Non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test for independent samples (p > 0.05).;Outcome found 04: There was no statistically significant difference in pain intensity in relation to obturator cement extravasation, a sample consisting of 62 with extravasation and 89 without extravasation. Non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test for independent samples (p > 0.05).;Outcome found 05: There was no statistically significant difference in pain intensity in relation to treatment time or patient age. Spearman brightness coefficient less than 0.30 for both.;Expected outcome 02: No statistically significant difference in pain intensity in relation to the dental group.;Expected outcome 03: No statistically significant difference in pain intensity in relation to periradicular status, with injury and without injury.;Expected outcome 04: No statistically significant difference in pain intensity in relation to filling cement extravasation, with extravasation and without extravasation.;Expected outcome 05: No statis

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactStella Reinke

Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná

reinkesmg@gmail.com+55 (41) 3271-2175

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)