Gingival Recession
Conditions
Interventions
This Cohort study with two arms, the gingival recession lesions were randomly allocated in to 2 different treatment groups:
Group de-epithealized graft (DE):conventional treatment by scaling and root
Zucchelli et al., 2010) (n=32 pacients)
Group parallel-incision graft (PI): conventional treatment by scaling and root planning (Gracey scales, Hu-Friedy, Chicago, Il, EUA) and root coverage by the subepithelial connective tissue graft obta
Procedure/surgery
Sponsors
Bauru School of dentistry-University of São Paulo
Bauru School of dentistry-University of São Paulo
Eligibility
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: gingival recession in two or more adjacent teeth (multiple recession type defects); teeth witout root canal treatment; Patients without signals of periodontal disease and with plaque and gingival index in all mouth lesser than 20%; And patients that agree to the free and informed consent terms
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: atients with systemic diseases that contraindicate surgical procedures or affect the course of healing; Patients who use medication that interferes with the healing process or who use anticonvulsant, antihypertensive or cyclosporine medications, or who have systemic diseases that pose a risk when performing surgical procedures; Smokers, pregnant women; Patients who have previously undergone periodontal surgery in the area of interest. And patients with orthodontic therapy in progression;
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Expected outcome 1: It is expected to find the frequency of presence or absence of pasty white / yellow secretion associated or not with a cul-de-sac fistulous tract in the recipient areas of the grafts, verified by the methods of digital palpation and inspection by a millimeter-periodontal probe in the recipient area, observed from the proportion of the percentages of cases with complications and without complications for each treatment, in the 12-month interval, using the logarithmic transformation method, considering the difference between the percentages, the value of 5%.;Obteined outcome 1: after twelve months were observed 5 (16%) complications in DE group and 1 on PI group (3.7%), the proportion rate was 12.42%, confidence interval -4.10 to 29.19%(p: 0.11). | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Secondary outcomes are not expected; | — |
Countries
Brazil
Contacts
Public ContactFaculdade de Odontologia de Bauru FOB USP
Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru
Outcome results
None listed