Loss of teeth due to accident
Conditions
Interventions
Compare two implant systems with different types of internal connection (pure morse taper vs. morse taper with screw locking) in the rehabilitation treatment with implants-prosthesis.
It will be inclu
Device
E06.892
Sponsors
Universidade Federal de Pelotas
Universidade Federal de Pelotas
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: In order to be included in the sample, patients will need to present the following characteristics: Present edentulism with an indication of installation of dental implant and posterior preparation of dental prosthesis or indication of extraction of a dental element by crack / fracture or root perforation with indication for installation of immediate dental implant and posterior confection of a dental prosthesis; To present good general state of health, that allows the accomplishment of the dental implant surgery; Availability of time and time to attend dental appointments in institutions.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Patients with any of the following characteristics may not be included in the sample: Patient with some systemic disease that prevents the accomplishment of the surgery for installation of dental implant; Patients with a history of chemo / radiotherapy in the last 10 years or who use systemic medications that may interfere with bone repair (eg bisphosphonates). Patients who do not have available hours of care in educational institutions.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The primary outcome to be evaluated will be the survival of the implants, which refers to the implant's position at the time of the consultation, regardless of the condition of the other related components / tissues (bone, soft tissue, prosthetic abutment, screw, prosthetic crown, etc ...) (Zarb and Albrektsson, 1998). | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Secondary outcomes are related to the success of the implant, and to the fact that all tissues around it have a satisfactory condition (Zarb and Albrektsson, 1998). For this study the outcomes evaluated will be probing depth, gingival bleeding, gingival retraction, bone loss around the implant, volumetric alteration and peri-implant soft tissue condition, and patient satisfaction. | — |
Countries
Brazil
Contacts
Public ContactMateus dos Santos
Universidade Federal de Pelotas
Outcome results
None listed