Simulation Training
Conditions
Interventions
a randomized, open study carried out between June 2022 and January 2023 with 28 nursing professionals from a hospital in the interior of Minas Gerais. The intervention group (IG: n = 14) was given a c
Sponsors
Fundação Cristiano Varella
Fundação Cristiano Varella
Eligibility
Age
19 Years to 47 Years
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Nursing professionals recently hired by the institution, within up to 90 days of admission; both genders; aged between 19 and 47 years
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Incomplete filling out of assessment instruments
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Expected outcome 1: Improved knowledge of CPR in both groups (intervention and control), but with the expectation that the group submitted to clinical simulation would have better results.;Outcome Found 1: Both groups showed a significant increase in CPR knowledge. However, the intervention group, which received clinical simulation training, had superior results in specific aspects such as identifying signs of CPR and shockable rhythms, as well as compression intervals and advanced airway ventilation. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Expected Secondary Outcome 1: It was expected that the group undergoing clinical simulation (CS) would show a more significant increase in self-confidence compared to the control group (CG) which only received lectures with demonstration of skills.;Secondary Outcome Found 1: Both groups (CS and CG) felt self-confident in their CPR skills after training. There was no significant difference in self-confidence between the groups, indicating that despite the effectiveness of clinical simulation training, the perception of self-confidence was similar for both types of training. | — |
Countries
Brazil
Contacts
Public ContactRafael Reis
Fundação Cristiano Varella
Outcome results
None listed