Skip to content

Self-care Education: A Comparative Study of the Quality of Life of Patients With Head and Neck Cancer

Education for Self-management: A Comparative Study of the Quality of Life of Patients With Head and Neck Neoplasia - :

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-2q53ct
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2017-08-08
Start date
2015-10-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Malignant neoplasm of head, face and neck

Interventions

Experimental group: 10 participants will participate in an educational program based on the principles of self-management, with a printed educational manual, educational video and simulation activity
Behavioural
I02.233.332

Sponsors

Escola Paulista de Enfermagem - Universidade Federal de São Paulo
Lead Sponsor
Escola Paulista de Enfermagem - Universidade Federal de São Paulo
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with head and neck neoplasia; Submitted to the first oncological treatment; Both sexes; older than 18 years; Less than 80 years.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with previous oncological treatment, patients diagnosed with psychiatric disorders.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The educational program developed aims to contribute to an increase in quality of life scores and control of anxiety and depression levels in patients with head and neck cancer, by improving the patient's adaptive responses. ;The questionnaires of quality of life and hospital scale of anxiety and depression (FACT-H & N and HADS) were applied at pre-treatment times, 90, 180 and 360 days after oncological treatment. In the analysis of the 20 patients selected, ten comprised the Control Group (GC) and ten the Experiment Group (GE). There was a significant difference in the FACT-H & N total score (0.0012), considering the interaction groups and times. In the HADS analysis, there was no statistically significant difference.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
We do not expect secondary outcomes

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactEdvane De Domenico

Escola Paulista de Enfermagem - Universidade Federal de São Paulo

domenico.edvane@unifesp.br+ 55 (11) 5576-4430

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)