FindTrial
Sign In

Self-perception of patients who wear dentures with quality of life and chewing efficiency when using two types of bite

Self-perceived oral health and masticatory efficiency in patients with implant-retained overdentures with conventional and lingualized balanced occlusion - crossover study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-2pwj2w9
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2021-02-01
Start date
2016-01-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mastication

Interventions

Clinical trial, two arms, uni-blind, randomized and crossed over the influence of the two types of occlusion (conventional balanced occlusion and balanced lingualized occlusion) on the masticatory per
Group 2 (n = 15) received the lingualized balanced occlusion. After the adaptation period, we waited 15 days for the masticatory performance test with almonds in different cycles: 30, 40 and until the
E06.780.346.760.775

Sponsors

Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho
Lead Sponsor
Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
60 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: class I intermaxillary relationship; little or moderate alveolar bone resorption with normal neuromuscular control; normal salivation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: class I Intermaxillary relationship; little or moderate alveolar bone resorption with normal neuromuscular control.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Through the method of evaluating the masticatory cycles and the quality of life questionnaires, it was observed that the masticatory performance was similar in both types of occlusal schemes, increasing according to the number of masticatory cycles. The assessment of self-perceived quality of life was always better in the second masticatory assessment, regardless of the occlusal scheme, considering the level of significance of the data at 5%.—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The occlusal schemes were exchanged between the groups and through the method of evaluating masticatory cycles and quality of life questionnaires, it was observed that the masticatory performance was similar in the two types of occlusal schemes, increasing according to the number of masticatory cycles. The assessment of self-perceived quality of life was always better in the second masticatory assessment, regardless of the occlusal scheme, considering the level of significance of the data at 5%.—

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactJoão Arioli Filho
joao.arioli@unesp.br+55-016-33016423

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)