Skip to content

Impact of Dignity Therapy in Cancer patients in follow-up with palliative care

Dignity Therapy effect in Cancer patients in follow-up with palliative care

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-2nygd6j
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2023-03-14
Start date
2023-03-02
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hospice Care

Interventions

A before-and-after, qualitative clinical trial with the recruitment of 34 cancer patients hospitalized in a Palliative Care unit. Before and after the intervention, which consists of the application o
E05.318.308.980

Sponsors

Hospital de Câncer de Barretos
Lead Sponsor
Hospital de Câncer de Barretos
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Greater than or equal to 18 years; carrier of an incurable disease; in exclusive palliative treatment or in joint follow-up (palliative care and oncology); be aware of the disease, incurability and prognosis; be able to understand and express themselves verbally and in writing through the Portuguese language spoken in Brazil; express spontaneous desire to participate in Dignity Therapy at the time of identification of eligibility criteria

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Having psychiatric illnesses such as personality disorders; mood disorders; anxiety disorders and psychoses through the evaluation of records in the medical record or prior knowledge of the patient; impaired cognitive ability to carry out reflections such as in situations of delirium due to organ dysfunction and/or end of life as well as dementia; prognosis less than two (2) weeks; for this last criterion it is possible to consider exceptions mainly if the patient has a very strong desire to undergo Dignity Therapy and for this it is extremely important to rearrange the organization of time; the prognosis only limits the patient's participation if it makes it impossible to maintain a conscious and guided dialogue

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Improvement in the meaning of life scores in the domains values, purpose, objectives and reflection by the Meaning in Life Scale that will be applied before and after the intervention (Dignity Therapy).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Improvement in inner peace and spiritual pain scores on the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS).

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactBianca;Michelle Paiva; Miwa

Hospital de Câncer de Barretos;Hospital de Câncer de Barretos

bsrpaiva@gmail.com;michelle.uchida@gmail.com+55(17)3321-6600;+55(17)3321-6600

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)