Skip to content

Restoration of teeth with different ways of insertion and protection of restorative material

Longevity of ART restorations in proximal cavities using different techniques of insertion and superficial protection

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-2nwk89
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2014-07-09
Start date
2010-05-20
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental caries

Interventions

Control group: 50 children were treated with atraumatic restorative treatment (ART), protected with petroleum jelly. Experimental group A: 50 children were treated with ART, protected with G-Coat. Exp
Procedure/surgery

Sponsors

Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade de São Paulo
Lead Sponsor
Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade de São Paulo
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
6 Years to 7 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Healthy volunteers; both genders; between 6 and 7 years of age; clinically presenting proximal caries lesion; lesion accessible to manual instruments used in atraumatic restorative treatment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Non-cooperative patients; restorations on the selected tooth; presence of fistula or abscess near the tooth selected to the research; presence of pulp exposure or mobility in the selected tooth

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Clinical evaluation of restorations: the groups in which the glass ionomer cement (GIC) was inserted using the 2 layers technique should present superior longevity, since it is believed that the placement of a thin layer of flowable GIC may incur in smaller air bubbles formation between the material and the tooth, therefore minimizing the formation of weakness areas, which could concentrate energy and start a fracture, leading to marginal defects or loss of the restoration

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Clinical evaluation of restorations: the groups of teeth that received the application of fluid resin with nanoparticles should have a superior clinical performance than those protected with petroleum jelly, since that in addition to protecting superficially the GIC from suffer syneresis or soaking water, it also would provide a more smoothness surface, which would result in higher resistance of the material, especially in proximal restorations

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactDaniela Hesse

Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade de São Paulo

dhesse@usp.br+55 (11) 3091 7814

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)