Skip to content

Effect of Different Types of Implants on the Total Mandible Rehabilitation

Titamax® and Helix® Implants in Protocol Procedures. A Clinical, Controlled, Randomized, Double-Blind and Multicentric Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-2nch7x
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2018-03-01
Start date
2017-12-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Edentulism

Interventions

Prothesis and Implants Placement. Thirty individuals with fully edentulous mandibles will participate in this split-month study. They will be submitted to the installation of 4 implants: Experimental
Control Group: Installation of implants with cylindrical macrostructure.
Procedure/surgery

Sponsors

Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara- Universidade Estadual Paulista
Lead Sponsor
Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara- Universidade Estadual Paulista
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 60 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Age between 18 and 60 years; Necessity of Lower total rehabilitation with osseointegrated implants; To present bone availability associated to the region between the mentual foramen enough for installation of a conventional implant; Presence of good systemic health; All implants should have at least 45N of insertion torque, to allow immediate loading of the implants.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Smokers and former smokers; Diabetics; Patients who use drugs or had pathologies that alter bone metabolism; Patients who use chronically anti-inflammatory and antibiotics drugs; Bruxism; Etilistis; Chemical dependents; Pregnant or wishing to become pregnant next year; History of radiotherapy in the head and neck region.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Analysis of success and survival of dental implants with different macrostructures in lower total rehabilitation techniques. Both implants are expected to have high levels of success and survival

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Analysis of primary and secondary stability and bone loss around implants with different macrostructures in lower total rehabilitation techniques. Hybrid implants are expected to exhibit higher primary and secondary stability values than the control implants.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactElcio Marcantonio Junior

Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara-Unesp

elciojr@foar.unesp.br+55(16)33016378

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)