Skip to content

Comparison of methods for masticatory function evaluation

Comparison of methodologies applied to masticatory function evaluation

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-2ht76k
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2015-03-18
Start date
2015-04-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Impaired mastication

Interventions

The present study will be develop in two steps. In the first step, 20 subjects presenting complete dentition will be selected. They will be instructed to chew Optocal and Optosil specimens, and capsul
Other

Sponsors

Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba UNICAMP
Lead Sponsor
Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba UNICAMP
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
25 Years to 70 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Health subjects; both gender; aged from 25 to 70 years; complete natural dentition or total edentulism wearing a conventional complete denture or a implant supported mandibular dentures.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Diagnostic of caries; periodontal disease; facial malformations; severe malocclusion; posterior crossbite; anterior open bite; parafunctional habits; temporomandibular disorder

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
It is expected that the colorimetric method presents the same results of the sieving fraction method when applied to quantify the masticatory function. In the colorimetric method, the results are expressed by nanometers after the spectrophotometric evaluation and while in the sieving method the results will be obtained as X50 values which corresponds to the opening of a hypothetical sieve, in mm, where about half of the crushed material is capable of crossing. It will then be made an equivalence relationship between the values in nanometers and mm, by percentage.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
It is expected that the colorimetric method presents the same results of the sieving fraction method when applied to quantify the masticatory function when applied to quantify the masticatory function for both complete dentate and totally edentulous subjects wearing prostheses. Results will be evaluated as described in the primary outcome.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactThaís Gonçalves

Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba UNICAMP

thaisgonc@gmail.com+55(19)9113-8743

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)