Skip to content

Prostatic Artery Embolization vs Open Prostatectomy: a comparative study between two different methods for the treatment of Prostate Enlargement.

Prostatic Artery Embolization vs Open Prostatectomy: comparative analysis in patients with LUTS secondary to BPH and prostates> 80ml - POPAE study Open Prostatectomy vs Prostatic Artery Embolization study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-2h3wqrj
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2022-02-14
Start date
2019-06-13
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Interventions

The Prostatic Artery Embolisation is the interruption of the prostatic blood flow through the microespheres. The method proposed is the superselective technique, with bilateral embolization of the pro

Sponsors

Disciplina de Urologia da Escola Paulista de Medicina da Universidade Federal de São Paulo
Lead Sponsor
Disciplina de Urologia da Escola Paulista de Medicina da Universidade Federal de São Paulo
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Male
Age
40 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Over 40 years Moderate/severe LUTS due to large-volume BPH (>80 mL) IPSS greater than or equal to 8 Quality of life greater than or equal to 3 Urodynamic showing obstruction

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Severe atherosclerosis Severe tortuosity in aortic bifurcation Neurogenic dysfunction Urethral stenosis Bladder diverticulum Bladder stone Underactive bladder Creatinine clearance <60ml.min Prostate cancer

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1 - Prymary Endpoint The primary endpoint is the evaluation in urodynamics parameters based on maximum flow rate (Qmax) and detrusor pressure on Qmax (PdetQmax) within 12 months. We hope PAE will be a inferior method compared to surgery. The PAE group would reach inferior improvement in Qmax (3-4 ml/sec) compared to the surgery group (> 5 ml/sec). This analysis will be made by a t-test comparing groups in 2 times: pre operative and 6 months post operative. We expect there is statistical difference after treatments in Qmax and PdetQmax comparing groups, with significant "p". The sample calculation was done considering the improvement in Qmax (media and standard deviation of 3 ml.second), accounting 23 patients to each arm.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
2 - Secondary Endpoint The secondary endpoint is the evaluation of IPSS and Quality of Life (QoL) questionnaires, comparing groups in 2 times: pre operative and 6 months post operative. We expect no differences in groups when analysed this clinical criteria, with a non significant p (through a t-test). We hope all patients will reach IPSS < 8 (mild symptoms) after treatments. ;3 - Secondary Endpoint In 6 months post operative, the patients in PAE arm will be submitted to a Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. The role of this exam is to measure the prostate shrinkage after embolisation, comparing to pre operative. The analysis will be made through a t-test.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactBruno Lebani

Disciplina de Urologia da Escola Paulista de Medicina da Universidade Federal de São Paulo

brlebani@gmail.com+5511994705981

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)