Skip to content

Surgical treatment of vaginal wall prolapse using the anchoring system or traditional technique

Sacrospinous ligament fixation using the Splentis anchoring system versus traditional technique for women with apical vaginal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-2gvcbq
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2019-09-13
Start date
2014-03-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pelvic organ prolapse

Interventions

Control group: 50 patients with moderate or severe genital prolapse who will be treated with the single Richter traditional sacrospinous fixation surgery and followed for 12 months Case group: 50 pat
Device
Procedure/surgery

Sponsors

Universidade Federal de São Paulo
Lead Sponsor
Universidade Federal de São Paulo
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female
Age
50 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Women; age between 50 and 80 years; symptomatic cervical or vaginal prolapse greater than stage II; primary or secondary prolapse; with or without associated urinary incontinence

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Genitourinary malignant neoplasia; pelvic radiotherapy; clinical diseases that made the surgical procedure unfeasible; collagen diseases; acute infectious disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Expected outcome 1: objective cure of surgical techniques characterized by descent of the vagina apex less than one third of the total vaginal length; we expect to confirm that the use of Splentis anchoring system for sacrospinal fixation is not inferior to the traditional technique using a 15% margin ;Observed outcome 1: Objective cure of genital prolapse was obtained in 80% of women who received Splentis and 73% of those who received the traditional technique, confirming the non-inferiority of the experimental technique

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Expected outcome 2: objective cure of surgical techniques characterized by composite criteria of descent of the vagina apex less than one third of the total vaginal length and no descent of the anterior and posterior vaginal wall up to the vaginal beyond the hymen 12 months after surgeries ;Observed outcome 2: objective cure by composite criteria was observed in 69% of women who received Splentis and 70% of women who received the traditional technique ;Expected outcome 3: improvement in quality of life and sexual function of women assessed through the scores of the P-Qol and PISQ-12 questionnaires 12 months after surgery is expected;Observed outcome 3: both surgical techniques equally improved women's quality of life and sexual function scores after 12 months of follow-up;Expected outcome 4: it is expected to compare surgical techniques with respect to peri and postoperative complications; surgical time; blood loss; urinary dysfunction; dyspareunia; pain; urinary infection; time to return to routine activities ;Outcome 4: We detected significantly shorter intraoperative time to dissect and reach the sacral spinal ligament (15 versus 22 min), shorter hospitalization time (24 versus 48 hs), lower urinary tract infection rates (11% versus 27%), and lower visual analog scale pain scores in the first 30 days postoperatively in patients who received Splentis compared to those who had traditional technique; no differences between surgeries related to other parameters

Countries

Argentina, Brazil, Mexico

Contacts

Public ContactRodrigo Castro

Universidade Federal de São Paulo

rodrigo.castro@uol.com.br+55(11)33854100

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)