Skip to content

Effects of yoga on different health markers

Effects of yoga on heart rate variability, electroencephalogram, quality of life, salivary cortisol and functional neuroimaging by magnetic resonance in healthy adults

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-2gv5c2
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2019-11-18
Start date
2014-04-05
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy individuals

Interventions

Experimental group: 15 healthy young adults aged 18 to 40 years without experience with Bhastrika Pranayama. The first stage took place in daily 30-minute meetings for a week. Over the next four weeks
Other

Sponsors

Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
Lead Sponsor
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 40 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Healthy volunteers; both genders; age between 18 and 40 years; no experience with Bhastrika Pranayama

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Diagnosis of heart problems; chronic rhinitis; frequent use of aspiration bronchodilator; regular use of beta blocker or stimulant and any drug that interferes with cardiac modulation; diagnosis of neurological or psychiatric disorders; pregnancy; metallic implants

Design outcomes

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate the effect of pranayama on emotional regulation mechanisms using functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Decrease in anxiety level assessed by one-month post-anxiety anxiety inventory compared to baseline (before training) and control group by repeated-measures ANOVA with two factors: intervention (pranayama x control) and time (before x after). We used the statistical threshold of p less than 0.05;Increase in positive affect and decrease in negative affect assessed using the Positive Affect and Negative Affect scale one month after training compared to baseline (before training) and the control group by repeated measures ANOVA with two factors: intervention (pranayama x control) and time (before x after). We used the statistical threshold of p less than 0.05.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactFernanda Fontes

Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte

fernandapalhano@neuro.ufrn.br+55-84-32154592

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 18, 2026