Skip to content

Performance of two adhesives in restoration of cervical lesions: a clinical trial

Performance of universal adhesive systems in different etching strategies in non-carious cervical lesions: a randomized clinical trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-2gqmvf
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2017-03-17
Start date
2017-03-13
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental abrasion/ Non-carious cervical lesion

Interventions

A total of 268 restorations will be performed. Group 1 - restoration will be performed using the Single Bond Universal Adhesive System (3M ESPE) with prior acid conditioning (37% phosphoric acid)
Group 2- will be performed using the Single Bond Universal Adhesive System in self-etching mode
Group 3- for the restoration will be used the Prime & Bond Elect Adhesive System (Dentsply) with prior acid conditioning (37% phosphoric acid)
Group 4- will use the Prime & Bond Elect Adhesive System in self-etching mode. Allocation of the groups will be randomized and restorative procedures will be performed under absolute isolation (with a
Other
E06.323.428

Sponsors

Universidade Federal de Santa Maria - UFSM
Lead Sponsor
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria - UFSM
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: to have at least 4, 8 or 12 teeth with non-carious cervical lesions (LCNC) on the vestibular face of anterior or premolar teeth; lesions being caries-free and non-retentive; lesions with depth greater than 1mm; in vital teeth and without mobility; to be in good health; at least 18 years old; be able to understand and sign the informed consent form; oral hygiene in an acceptable level; present at least 20 teeth in occlusion; be willing to return the reevaluation consultations.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Teeth with considerable or severe dentinal hypersensitivity; teeth without pulp vitality to the thermal test; absence of antagonistic tooth; patients in orthodontic treatment; patients with severe bruxism with wear facets corresponding to more than 50% of dental structure; extremely poor oral hygiene; with severe or chronic periodontal disease.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Restoration retention. Two evaluation criteria will be used to evaluate restoration retention. The USPHS (United States Public Health Service) evaluation criteria and the FDI (World Dental Federation) evaluation criteria. For the USPHS criterion the evaluation scores are Alpha (Restoration present) or Charlie (restoration absent). For the FDI criterion, the evaluation scores range from 1 to 5, with 1 being: clinically excellent - no fractures or cracks; And 5: clinically poor - partial or total loss of the restoration.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary outcomes are not expected

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactAndressa Follak

Universidade Federal de Santa Maria - UFSM

andressafollak@gmail.com55 55 99623-7165

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)