Low back pain
Conditions
Interventions
The blinding process of the study was carried out in a double-blind manner, in which the researcher who will intervene will only know the intervention at the time of the draw with the patient. While t
E02.190.599
Sponsors
CBO - Colégio Brasileiro de Osteopatia
CBO - Colégio Brasileiro de Osteopatia
Eligibility
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Age above or equal to 18 years; both genders; abdominal surgery between umbilicus and pubic symphysis; Sensitivity to palpation at any of the vertebral levels from L1 to S3; chronic low back pain
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Volunteers diagnosed with a rheumatic disease; Drug history; Excessive drug use; Low back pain less than 3 months old
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| It is expected, at the end of the study, that the sensitized vertebral levels found previously will be less sensitive and the pain will be lower on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) after the intervention and at the 10 and 20 day follow-ups. Pain levels will be assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), a subjective scale from 0-10, where 0 is considered no pain and 10 unbearable pain. As well as through pressure pain threshold performed with an algometer (MED.DOR, Brazil) measuring the pressure in kilos per cm2 in the paravertebral musculature of the most sensitive levels. Treatment effects (ie, mean differences between groups) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using mixed linear models using 'time versus group' interaction terms. These interaction terms are equivalent to differences between groups. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| It is expected, at the end of the study, an improvement in complaints and disability during the participants' daily lives after the intervention and in the 10 and 20 day follow-ups. The patient's levels of disability and day-to-day complaints were assessed using the Roland-Morris questionnaire, consisting of 24 questions, allowing a score from 0 to 24, and the Oswestry 2.0 disability questionnaire, consisting of 10 questions, allowing a score of 0 to 50. Treatment effects (ie, mean differences between groups) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using mixed linear models using 'time versus group' interaction terms. These interaction terms are equivalent to differences between groups.;It is expected to find an increase in joint range of motion after the intervention and at the 10 and 20-day follow-ups, through the evaluation using Bank of Wells. The measurement will be performed by means of the horizontal displacement of the trunk, performing the flexion of the same sitting and with the knees extended, the measurement will be performed in centimeters. 95% were calculated using mixed linear models using 'time versus group' interaction terms. These interaction terms are equivalent to differences between groups. | — |
Countries
Brazil
Contacts
Public ContactDaniel Makita
Faculdade Integradas Einstein de Limeira
Outcome results
None listed