Skip to content

Effects of shiatsu-associated physical therapy on pain and fatigue in patients with Multiple Sclerosis

POSSIBLE SHIATSU EFFECTS ON PAIN AND FAILURE IN PEOPLE WITH MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-2c6ymn
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2019-09-19
Start date
2019-04-06
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Sclerosis

Interventions

This research will be characterized as quantitative, and the study design will be experimental, prospective, about the effect of an intervention. - Clinical trial, randomized, parallel, unicex, with t
Other
E02.190.599.750.500
E02.760.169.063.500.387.750
E02.190.599.750.750

Sponsors

Centro Universitário Filadélfia
Lead Sponsor
Centro Universitário Filadélfia
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 70 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Volunteers with diagnosis of multiple sclerosis; of both sexes; older than 18 years; with staging of 0 to 6; were not classified during the 3-month period prior to the start of the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Volunteers with neurological diagnosis besides multiple sclerosis; unable to understand or perform the tests proposed in the study; the physical or psychological impossibility of individuals; being hospitalized at the time of data collection or outbreak at the time of data collection.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Primary Outcomes Pain:The DN4 questionnaire, originally in French, was duly translated and validated into Portuguese, and was used to identify non-neuropathic neuropathies and neuropathic pain patients. It consists of 10 items subdivided into two parts: sensory descriptors (seven items) and related signs for sensory examination (three items) (VAL et al 2011). 2. Visual Analog Pain Scale;The Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) is a subjective scale for the evaluation of fatigue, being a questionnaire where the information obtained is self-reported. It has a multidimensional character, and it is composed of 21 items, subdivided into 3 domains (physical, cognitive and psychosocial), obtaining scores from 0 to 4 for each item, totaling a total score of 84 points. The determination of fatigue is verified when the scores are equal to or greater than 38, so a score of less than 38 indicates the absence of fatigue;The first table will contain the first expected outcome. This will be identified as Expected outcome - pain. Pain reduction is expected in at least 50% of patients with multiple sclerosis.;In the second table, the outcome found for what was presented.;Expected outcome - fatigue It is expected to reduce at least 25% of fatigue.;Outcome found regarding what was presented - fatigue.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Pittsburg Scale is used to assess sleep quality in patients with possible sleep disorders during the last month. The questionnaire contains 19 questions, divided into seven components with a classification from 0 to 3, which are composed of component 1 subjective quality of sleep, component 2 sleep latency, component 3 sleep duration, component 4 sleep efficiency, component 5 disturbance of sleep, component 6 use of medication to sleep and component 7 dysfunction during the day, these values ??obtained of each component is summed until obtaining a score of each item, from 0 to 21, the totalized sum has as indicative the greater the greater value will be dysfunction of sleep quality.;The Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29-BR) is composed of 29 questions subdivided into two domains: physical (20 items) and psychological (9 items), with a score of 0 to 4 for each item. The sum of the two domains has a total score of 116 points, and the higher the score the greater the impact of MS on the patient's health and thus a poorer quality of life;Expected outcome - sleep The sleep condition is expected to improve by at least 4 points.;Outcome found regarding what was presented - sleep.;Expected outcome - quality of life The quality of life is expected to improve by at least 25% of the initial score.;Outcome found regarding what was presented - quality of life.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactMichelle Fillis

Centro Universitário Filadélfia

micmoreira@gmail.com+55 43 991615577

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)