Skip to content

Comparing Treatments for bleeding control and palate healing after soft Tissue Graft removal

Comparison of different hemostatic treatments and morbidity control and palate healing after soft tissue graft removal: randomized clinical trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-2c67h58
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2024-12-13
Start date
2024-06-03
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Malignant neoplasm of overlapping sites of palate

Interventions

The sample will consist of 24 patients with indication for periodontal plastic surgery associated with soft tissue grafting. The invitation to participate in the study will be made through a screening
(2) of both sexes
(3) who do not present significant systemic impairments preoperatively
(4) with good oral hygiene, defined as a plaque index less than or equal to 25%
(5) with indication for periodontal plastic surgery using soft tissue graft
and without a history of soft tissue extraction from the palate. Patients who (1) have significant systemic disorders
(2) who use anticoagulant o

Sponsors

Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
Lead Sponsor
Centro de Ensino e Pesquisa em Implantes Dentários
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients over 18 years of age; of both genders; without significant systemic impairments in the preoperative phase; with good oral hygiene, defined by a plaque index of 25% or less; indicated for periodontal plastic surgery using a soft tissue graft; with no history of soft tissue removal from the palate

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with significant systemic disorders; those using anticoagulant or antiplatelet drugs; pregnant women; smokers; those with clinical and/or radiographic signs of periapical pathologies; untreated periodontal disease at the surgical site; individuals allergic to polymers

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
There was a 50% increase in the number of post-operative pains in the first 7 days between the suture group and the intra-oral adhesive group, verified using the VAS method, with less pain in the intra-oral adhesive group.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
We expect to find a reduction in post-operative healing time in the intra-oral adhesive group compared to the suture group.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactThalles Balduino

Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

thalles.balduino@posgrad.ufsc.br+55(48)37219077

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)