Skip to content

Comparing two doses of Botulinum toxin A in the treatment of urinary symptoms

A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing different doses of Abobotulinum toxin A in the treatment of Idiopathic Detrusor Overactivity

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-25k53m
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2017-01-25
Start date
2013-07-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Urinary incontinence

Interventions

Treatment consists of intramuscular application of botulinum toxin into the bladder wall, within the detrusor muscles. It is performed with direct visualization of the inside of the bladder, through c
only the investigator knows the administered dose. Given the transient effect of the medication, patients are allowed to request a new injection upon the recurrence of symptoms. Reapplication is possi

Sponsors

Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo
Lead Sponsor
Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Female partients; aged 18 years or older; diagnosis of idiopathic overactive bladder; refractoriness to treatment with behavioral measures and pharmacological therapy; or contraindication to the use of anticholinergics

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with cognitive deficit; extensive fibroids; tumors; grade III and IV prolapses; changes in bladder emptying, with high residue (above 150mL) or use of catheterization previously or repeat UTIs; predominant stress urinary incontinence; prior treatment with the toxin

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary outcome is to detect a 35% difference in therapeutic success between groups at the 24th week. Therapeutic success is defined when the responses of patient global impression of improvement are very much better (1), much better and better (2)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
As secondary outcomes, we expect clinical improvement quantified through the symptom questionnaire (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Overactive Bladder), reducing its value (can vary from 0 to 16). For urodynamic parameters, we expect increase in maximum cystometric capacity, non-detection of detrusor overactivity or, if detrusor overactivity is present, increase in the volume of the first detrusor overactivity. We also expected high treatment satisfaction, assessed using a visual analogue scale from 0 to 10;Safety outcomes are also secondary endpoints, assessed through the occurrence of urinary retention, urinary tract infection and the need for clean intermittent catheterization. An increase in post-void residual volume is observed after the intervention. The indication for catheterization is based on a PVR greater than 150 mL in symptomatic patients, or greater than 300 mL even in the absence of symptoms. UTIs episodes are more frequently observed following the intervention;Repeated injections are administered based on spontaneous demand. At the time of the second injection, patients have their initial doses changed: 300U-500U and 500U-300U dose. From the third injection onward, we use a standardized dose of 500U. As secondary outcomes, we assess the interval between first and second injections. Additionally, Additionally, we expect to observe maintenance of efficacy results in reapplications

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactDanielle;Luis Bezerra;de Toledo

Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo;Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo

danibezerra@uol.com.br;drluisgtoledo@gmail.com+55-11-933423977;+55-11-996395014

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)