Skip to content

The influence of Pilates on the strength and functionality of the elderly

Biological, behavioral and sociocultural analysis in adults and elderly individuals who practice physical exercises

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-24z8q24
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2021-12-14
Start date
2018-03-20
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Exercise Movement Techniques

Interventions

Experimental group: 19 elderly people who did not practice regular physical activities for at least six months, considered robust elderly people by the IVCF-20 (Functional Clinical Vulnerability Index
G11.427.590.530.698.277 I03.350
E02.779.483.750 E02.831.387.750 G11.427.
G11.427.590.530.698

Sponsors

Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Lead Sponsor
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
60 Years to 79 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Being between 60 and 79 years of age; not having been practicing physical exercises for at least six months; presenting a medical certificate claiming to be fit for Pilates, presenting a score less or equal 14 points in the Clinical-Functional Vulnerability Index-20 classified as elderly with moderate risk of clinical-functional vulnerability

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Neurological; cardiovascular; respiratory and orthopedic diseases that prevent Pilates exercises; smoking habits; wheelchair use; frequency of less than 75% in classes during the time proposed for the established training

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To assess respiratory muscle strength, it was expected to find a score above 53cmH2O for Maximum Inspiratory Pressure and a score above 74cmH2O for Maximum Expiratory Pressure, using the manovacuometer, after 18 weeks of training with exercises of the Pilates Method of soil. There was a significant difference (p = 0.016) in the Maximum Inspiratory Pressure between the pre 53.26cmH2O and the post 67.42cmH2O. The same was found in Maximum Expiratory Pressure, which also increased significantly after intervention (p = 0.005), initially the value was 70.89cmH2O and after training 94.42cmH2O.;To evaluate the functional capacity, through the 6-minute walk test, after 18 weeks of training with exercises of the Pilates Method of soil. It was expected to find a distance covered above 435 meters and Pico VO2 max above 17.04%. It was observed that there was a significant increase (p = 0.002) in the distance covered, which initially was 435.32 meters and after the intervention period, 489.95 meters.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary outcomes were not expected.;Secondary outcomes were not expected.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactClademir de Quadros
cep.ufsm@gmail.com+55 55 3220-9362

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)