Skip to content

Arthrocentesis vs nonsurgical methods in the treatment of temporomandibular joint pain and closed lock. A randomized controlled trial

Does the association of Nsaids whit arthrocentesis for 30 days improve the mouth opening and painfull symptoms in temporomandibular joint dysfunction

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-24y9dd
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2020-01-06
Start date
2019-10-07
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction Syndrome, Diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue

Interventions

60 individuals with internal joint disorders with pain and mouth opening limitation will be random in 4 groups of 15 patients each for treatment of joint disorder: 1. Control group
Exclusive conservative treatment consisting of pasty diet, compresses, physiotherapy and habit control. 2. Joint washing
In addition to conservative treatment, a single wash of the affected temporomandibular joint with 200 ml of saline will be performed. 3. Wash with 200 ml of saline, conservative treatment and therap
Drug
Procedure/surgery
E02.779

Sponsors

Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade Estadual do Rio de Janeiro
Lead Sponsor
Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade Estadual do Rio de Janeiro
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 67 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients older than 18 years and younger than 67; presenting at least 4 points corresponding to joint pain in the visual analogue scale (VAS); with mouth opening at less or equal than to 35 mm; with a history of joint locking; progressive decrease of mouth opening and joint noises

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: History of TMJ surgery or with an absolute indication of surgical treatment; joint systemic diseases; gastric disease or other condition that contraindicate the use of NSAIDs; muscular pain as the main source of the symptomatology and patients with psychological compromises that would make treatment impossible

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate the effectiveness of each treatment in reducing temporomandibular pain during mandibular opening using the visual analog scale (VAS) method, where we will observe on a scale from 0 to 10 the rate of auricular pain decrease over a period of six months.;To evaluate the effectiveness of each treatment in increasing the mandibular opening verified by the interincisal distance in millimeters over a period of six months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate the influence of the instituted treatments on the reduction of inflammatory agents (immunoglobulins) in the synovial fluid, comparing the preoperative samples and one month after treatment. Identify the inflammatory molecules present in temporomandibular disorders.;To evaluate the effectiveness of each treatment in reducing temporomandibular pain during mandibular protrusion and laterality using the analogous visual scale (VAS) method, where we will observe on a scale from 0 to 10 the rate of pre-auricular pain decrease over a period of six months;To evaluate the influence of changes in the position of the articular disc in the treatment to reduce temporomandibular pain and increase mandibular opening using the analogous visual scale (VAS) 0 to 10 and interincisal distance in millimeters comparing the the presence or absence of any internal joint change.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactAlexander Pomares Cueto

Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade Estadual do Rio de Janeiro

alexander.maxilofacial@gmail.com+55 21 998564792

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)