Skip to content

Efficacy of 4% Articaine anesthesia in the buccal region of the mandible with the Infiltrative Technique

Anesthetic efficacy of 4% Articaine with 1: 100.000 Epinephrine by the Vestibular Infiltration Technique

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-248jys
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2019-10-22
Start date
2018-09-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pulpitis

Interventions

Clinically evaluate the anesthetic efficacy of 1.8 mL of the anesthetic Articaine 4% with Epinephrine 1: 100,000 by the vestibular infiltrative technique (experimental group, n=15) after the inferior
Drug
Procedure/surgery
D03.383.621.450
E06.397
E03.155.086.231

Sponsors

Universidade Estadual de Maringá - UEM
Lead Sponsor
Universidade Estadual de Maringá - UEM
Collaborator

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Painful symptomatology in one or more mandibular molars; symptomatic irreversible pulpitis; ASA I and ASA II patients; teeth that can be isolated and rehabilitated

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients under 18 years of age; pregnant and lactating women; allergic to local anesthetics; using drugs that alter the pain threshold; teeth with open apex; root fracture; absence of lip numbness

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary outcome tested will be the anesthetic success. Results will be recorded in a Microsoft Excel worksheet. (Microsoft Office Excel 2017; Microsoft Corp, Redmond, WA) and subjected to a descriptive analysis. Association tests with the dependent variable, success, categorized as dichotomous (success or failure), will be verified by Fisher's exact test. The null hypothesis tested will be that there is no difference in anesthetic success between patients receiving inferior alveolar nerve block and those receiving vestibular infiltrative complementation. Therefore, Fisher's exact test will indicate if there is an association between the group and anesthetic success, ie, if there is a statistically significant difference between the groups.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The secondary outcome analyzed will be the pain reduction after the anesthetic techniques, which will be verified by means of a modified Heft-Parker visual analog scale. The results obtained will be verified by the Two-way ANOVA test. Intra-group and inter-group analyzes will be performed.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactMarcelo Capitanio

Universidade Estadual de Maringá - UEM

marcelocapitanioo@gmail.com+5544997160736

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)