Wound Healing
Conditions
Interventions
In present study, the sample consisted of 30 patients, aged between 18 and 60 years, of both genders, who were divided into 2 groups, each with 15 patients. After the extracion, 150 mL of protocol 1 (
Drug
E06.892
Sponsors
Universidade Federal de Sergipe
Universidade Federal de Sergipe
Eligibility
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: systematically healthy patients; indication for contralateral tooth extraction from extensive carious lesion, periodontal disease or orthodontic indication, without osteotomy or odontosection
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: uncontrolled systemic pathologies; smokers; alcoholics; pregnant women; patients allergic to one or more drugs used; patients who have used anti-inflammatory drugs or antibiotics in the last 7 days
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Expected Outcome 1 - Chlorhexidine presents better results in comparison to the phytotherapic in the clinical criteria analyzed: bleeding, necrosis and hyperemia after 07 days of the surgical procedure;Found Outcome 1 - There was no difference between chlorhexidine and phytotherapic in the clinical criteria analyzed (bleeding, necrosis and hyperemia) after 07 days of the surgical procedure;Expected outcome 2 - Due to its analgesic properties, Phytotherapy shows better results compared to chlorhexidine in the pain parameter (through the visual analogue scale) after 24 hours and 07 days of the surgical procedur;Found outcome 2 - There was no difference between chlorhexidine and phytotherapic in the pain parameter, after 24 hours and 07 days of the surgical procedure | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Secondary outcomes are not expected | — |
Countries
Brazil
Contacts
Public ContactGustavo dos Santos
Universidade Federal de Sergipe
Outcome results
None listed