Diabetes Mellitus type 1
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention Group (IG)- Six adolescents, aged between 14 and 19 years, received the standard consultation at the Health Unit and the application of the Brief Motivational Interviewing (BMI) through t
completed the form with sociodemographic and clinical data
and answered the Diabetes Empowerment Scale- Short Form (DES-SF). After the second telephone contact, they were asked to complete the DES-SF again to compare self-efficacy between adolescents with DM1
and responded to the DES-SF. Five to nine months after recruitment, they completed the DES-SF again.
The random allocation of the participants to the two groups (IG and GC) was proportional (1:1) and
Sponsors
Universidade Estadual do Ceará
Universidade Estadual do Ceará
Eligibility
Age
14 Years to 19 Years
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Adolescents aged between 14 and 19 years old diagnosed with Diabetes Mellitus type 1 for at least six months; accompanied regularly in the service; with phone access
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Adolescents who had any cognitive or behavioral difficulties that prevented communication from effectively participating in the interview
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The expected outcome will be an increase in the self-efficacy of adolescents with type 1 diabetes who received the educational intervention. Verified by the Diabetes Self-Efficacy Scale. The groups will be compared in two moments: during recruitment; and in the period of up to two months after the last intervention. And, in the Control group, in the period of five to nine months after recruitment. For these comparisons, Fisher's exact test will be used to ascertain the homogeneity of the groups due to the sample size, the chi-square and Pearson tests (categorical variables) and the Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U test. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| To verify the association between the self-efficacy scores of adolescents with DM1 and their sociodemographic variables. The variables will be analyzed descriptively and inferentially, considering simple frequency, percentage, mean, median and standard deviation. In the descriptive analysis, the sociodemographic and clinical characterization of the participants will be used, in addition to the description of the aspects associated with the self-efficacy of adolescents with DM1. | — |
Countries
Brazil
Contacts
Public ContactLaura Brito
Universidade Estadual do Ceará
Outcome results
None listed