Skip to content

Graft derived from the patient’s own blood to enhance the healing of complex wounds.

Autologous Fibrin Matrix Therapy in the Treatment of Individuals with Complex Wounds.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-10qwh849
Enrollment
56
Registered
2026-03-10
Start date
2026-03-09
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Wounds and Injuries

Interventions

This is an open-label, two-arm, randomized clinical trial with a blinded outcome, aiming to compare the treatment outcomes of people with foot ulcers related to Diabetes Mellitus (DM) in two parallel

Sponsors

Centro de Ciências da Saúde - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
Lead Sponsor
FAPESC - Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e Inovação do Estado de Santa Catarina
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Be over 18 years of age; regardless of gender; have a medical diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus with a foot ulcer or lesion resulting from foot amputation related to Diabetes Mellitus; not be undergoing treatment with Autologous Leukocyte Platelet Fibrin Matrix; be available to attend the health service once a week

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Pregnancy; lesions suspected of being malignant; significant anemia; wound with active bleeding; continuous use of anticoagulant medication; Ankle Brachial Index values ??indicating severe ischemia; active infection; antibiotic use in the last month; chronic kidney disease; blood borne diseases; ulcers larger than 49 cm2; individuals with any type of reported allergy to the products of the therapies used in treatment (dressings/wound dressings)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Measure the size of the lesion (in square centimeters - cm² and cubic volume - cm³). Primary outcome, continuous quantitative variable, obtained by measuring the lesion every 4 weeks using a millimeter ruler. The area is calculated using the formula: greatest length of the lesion multiplied by the greatest width. The volume is calculated using the formula: greatest length of the lesion multiplied by the greatest width multiplied by the greatest depth. According to the Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool (BWAT), it may receive a score of: 1 point for lesions smaller than 4 cm²; 2 points for sizes between 4 and 16 cm²; 3 points for sizes between 16.1 and 36 cm²; 4 points for sizes between 36.1 and 80 cm²; and 5 points for lesions larger than 80 cm². Continuous variables with an asymmetrical distribution will be presented as median and interquartile range, using the Mann-Whitney test (or Kruskal-Wallis test, when appropriate) for comparison between groups. A decrease in lesion size and a decrease in the score received for this outcome are expected.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Assess the type of necrotic tissue in the lesion. This is a secondary outcome, a nominal categorical variable, clinically assessed (measured) by inspection, characterized by the presence of non-viable tissue in the wound bed. According to the Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool (BWAT), it may receive a score based on its characterization: 1 point for absence; 2 points for the presence of non-viable white/gray tissue or non-adherent yellowish slough; 3 points for slightly adherent yellowish slough; 4 points for adherent yellowish slough; and 5 points for a black, hard, fully adherent eschar. Nominal categorical variables will be described by absolute and relative frequencies (proportions), and compared using the chi-square or Fisher's exact test. Absence is expected over the follow-up period and/or a decrease in the score received for this outcome.;Measuring the amount of necrotic tissue in the lesion. Secondary outcome, nominal categorical variable, clinically assessed (measured) by inspection, characterized by the proportion of the lesion area with non-viable tissue in its bed. According to the Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool (BWAT), it may receive a score value, according to its characterization: 1 point for 0% of the wound covered; 2 points for less than 25% of the wound covered; 3 points when between 25% and 50% of the wound covered; 4 points when between 51% and 75% of the wound covered; and 5 points when between 75% and 100% of the wound covered. Nominal categorical variables will be described by absolute and relative frequencies (proportions), being compared by the chi-square or Fisher's exact test. It is expected to observe absence (0%) over the follow-up period and/or a decrease in the score received for this outcome.;Assess granulation tissue in the wound. Secondary outcome, nominal categorical variable, clinically assessed by inspection, characterized by the presence of granulation tissue in the wound bed. According to the Bates-Jensen Wound A

Countries

BR

Contacts

Public ContactMilena Pereira

Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

mile.pe@gmail.com+55-48-37214164

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Apr 4, 2026