Skip to content

Comparison of two types of grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery of the knee: rectus femoris and hamstring tendons

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with rectus femoris tendon graft compared with hamstring tendons: A randomized clinical trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-10n9vc7g
Enrollment
84
Registered
2026-06-08
Start date
2026-07-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

Interventions

This is a two-arm, open-label, randomized controlled clinical trial with 84 participants divided into two parallel groups in a 1:1 ratio. Randomization was performed using permuted blocks, stratified

Sponsors

Hospital Maradei
Lead Sponsor
Hospital Maradei
Collaborator
Instituto de Ciências da Saúde da Universidade Federal do Pará - UFPA
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 50 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Both sexes; age between 18 and 50 years; isolated anterior cruciate ligament injury confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging; indication for primary surgical reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament; residence in Belém do Pará; signed informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Previous history of knee surgeries; associated meniscal or chondral lesions grade III or IV; neuromuscular or rheumatological diseases; smoking; refusal to sign the informed consent form; identification of associated meniscal or cartilage lesions grade III or IV during intraoperative assessment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
A difference in knee function between the two groups is expected, assessed using the subjective International Knee Documentation Committee score, a self-administered questionnaire validated for Brazilian Portuguese that generates a score from 0 to 100 where higher values indicate better function and fewer symptoms, applied preoperatively and at 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively, this being the outcome used to calculate the sample size with a minimal clinically important difference of 10 points, statistical power of 80% and confidence of 90%;A difference in knee function between the two groups is expected, assessed using the Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, a self-administered questionnaire validated for Portuguese composed of eight questions that generates a score from 0 to 100, applied preoperatively and at 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
A difference in pain level at the graft donor site between the two groups is expected, assessed using a visual analog scale from 0 to 10 where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents the worst imaginable pain, measured exclusively at the 1-month postoperative visit, with the donor site being the anterior aspect of the thigh for the rectus femoris group and the posterior aspect of the thigh for the hamstring group;A difference in range of motion recovery of the operated knee between the two groups is expected, assessed by measuring passive flexion and extension using a universal goniometer, with values recorded in degrees at the 1, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperative assessments;The incidence of adverse events between the two groups is expected to be assessed, including surgical site infection, deep vein thrombosis, joint stiffness (arthrofibrosis) and neurovascular injury, actively monitored and recorded on a standard form at all follow-up visits during the first 12 months postoperatively

Countries

BR

Contacts

Public ContactGeorge Lima

Hospital Maradei

george_kalif@hotmail.com+55-91-981366554

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 29, 2026