Skip to content

Efficacy and safety of the combined use of a bioestimulator and ultrasound for improvement of facial sagging

Efficacy and safety of the combined use of Poly-L-lactic acid and Microfocused Ultrasound for improvement of Facial Sagging: a randomized, triple-blind, controlled clinical trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-10mk5gvb
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2024-08-27
Start date
2025-12-15
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-11-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Skin aging

Interventions

This is a randomized, controlled, triple-blind clinical trial. Experimental group: 17 patients will be applied microfocused ultrasound (shots with 0.7 to 0.9J) followed by injection with 2 vials of po

Sponsors

Fernanda Almeida Nunes Castro
Lead Sponsor
Angioderm Centro de Estética Ltda
Collaborator
Clinica Dermatológica Milide
Collaborator
Clinica Boro Seviços Médicos Ltda
Collaborator
Morais e Neuenschwander Medicina Integrada
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female
Age
35 Years to 50 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Healthy women, 35 and 50 years old, with mild to moderate facial laxity.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: facial surgical scar; history of herpes simplex infection; active or systemic infection; non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs use; anticoagulants use; steroids use; heparin; vitamin K or E within the last 30 days prior to the study; pregnancy; breastfeeding; any clinical condition and or laboratory abnormality; previous aesthetic procedures with biostimulators or physical resources such as laser, radiofrequency and or ultrasound on the face in the last 3 years; injection of permanent materials in the face anytime

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Improvement in facial skin sagging by scale: improvement of at least 2 points after 6 months, and at least 1 point after 3 months according to the sagging scale;Adverse event ratio: calculated the relation of the number of participants who had any adverse event by the total number of participants.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Improvement of sagging in the upper third: the lift of the eyebrow, in mm, after 3 and/or 6 months compared to pre-procedure;Global aesthetic improvement: improved, much improved or very much improved of the GAIS scale after 3 and 6 months, compared to the pre-procedure evaluation, assessed by doctors and participants;Maintenance of Global aesthetic improvement at 6 months: maintanance of GAIS values between 3 and 6 months of GAIS assessed by doctors and participants ;Improvement of flaccidity (lifting effect): global improvement, in mm, of the lifting of the face ;Cumulative adverse event percentage curve plotted;Total adverse event rate: the ratio of the total number of adverse events reported by the total number of patients. ;Pain: analyzed by visual analogue scale (VAS) during the first 24 hours after procedure

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactFernanda Nunes

Angioderm Centro de Estética Ltda

contato@clinicafernandanunes.com.br+55(11) 4208-6640

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)