Skip to content

Effectiveness of distance exercises associated with self management booklet in patients with neck pain

Effectiveness of telerehabilitation exercise program versus online self management booklet on pain and disability in patients with non-specific chronic neck pain: a randomized controlled trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-10h7khvk
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2022-09-16
Start date
2022-08-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neck Pain

Interventions

Participants will be divided into two groups (Telerehabilitation Group and Control Group) using Research Randomizer, an online random number generator. Allocation (1:1 ratio) will be performed by an i

Sponsors

Universidade Federal do Pará
Lead Sponsor
Universidade Federal do Pará
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 60 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Age between 18 and 60 years; of both genders; presence of cervical spine pain of at least 3 points on the numerical pain scale from 0 to 10; have access to the internet and ability to read and understand the portuguese language

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Presence of severe musculoskeletal, cardiovascular and metabolic disorders; history of neurological injuries; use of muscle relaxants; obesity; presence of red flag with weight loss without apparent cause, fever and moderate to severe trauma; any health condition that makes it impossible to exercise

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate disability using the Brazilian-Portuguese version of Neck Disability Index, comparing the baseline value at the end of the 6-week intervention and with 3-month follow-up

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate pain intensity using the Numerical Pain Scale (END), comparing the baseline value at the end of the 6-week intervention and with 3-month follow-up;To evaluate perception of global effect using the Perceived Global Effect Scale, comparing the baseline value at the end of the 6-week intervention and with 3-month follow-up;To evaluate patient self-efficacy using the Pain Self Efficacy Questionnaire, comparing the baseline value at the end of the 6-week intervention and with 3-month follow-up;To evaluate quality of life measured by the SF-12 questionnaire (Version 2), comparing the baseline value at the end of the 6-week intervention and with 3-month follow-up;To evaluate kinesiophobia measured using the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, comparing the baseline value at the end of the 6-week intervention and with 3-month follow-up;To evaluate patient adherence will be assessed with the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Exercise Adherence Rating Scale (EARS), comparing the baseline value at the end of the 6-week intervention and with 3-month follow-up

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactMauricio Magalhães

Universidade Federal do Pará

mauriciomag@ufpa.br+55(91)32018892

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 10, 2026