Skip to content

May geometric modifications of implants influence implant repair in smokers?

Clinical study of the influence of different macrogeometries and surface treatments of dental implants inserted in smoking patients. Clinical aspects and immunological

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-10gjvcyt
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2023-12-06
Start date
2018-02-15
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Smoking

Interventions

The population of present prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind, split-mouth clinical study were randomly assigned, using a computer-generated list generated a priori by a team member not
HCAN – healing chambers + dual thread design [thread within thread profile] and activated nanosurface - nano-sized HA according to the Promimic HAnano™ method 37 (UNITITE - S.I.N. IMPLANT SYSTEM) (n=3
D25.339.312

Sponsors

Universidade Paulista
Lead Sponsor
Universidade Paulista
Collaborator

Eligibility

Age
18 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Smokers who smoke more than 10 cigarettes/day; aged between 18 and 65 years; both genders; with the presence of at least 20 teeth in the oral cavity; bilateral and homologous unitary prosthetic space

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Presence of systemic diseases that could interfere with bone regeneration, such as diabetes, arthritis, hypothyroidism, hyperparathyroidism, and osteoporosis; pregnancy or breastfeeding; use of medications that counter-indicated the performance of surgical procedures or that could alter bone regeneration around implants (e.g., anti-inflammatory and bisphosphonate drugs); absence of keratinized tissue at the implant insertion sites (may interfere with hygiene around the implants); need for bone or tissue grafts

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Expected outcome 1: Modifications in the implant geometry are expected to positively influence the bone markers studied, through immunoenzymatic analysis, increasing the concentration (pg/ml) of osteoblastogenic and angiogenic markers and reducing the concentration (pg/ml) of osteoclastogenic markers.;Found outcome 1: Using immunoenzymatic analysis, higher levels (pg/ml) of osteoblastogenic and angiogenic markers were observed in the presence of geometric modifications of the implants.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Expected outcome 2: It is expected that periodic modifications will contribute to increasing the stability quotient of affected implants through resonance frequency analysis;Found outcome 2: It was found in the resonance frequency analysis, that the implant stability quotient presented higher values for HCAN implants at 60-day time-point (early phase)

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactMônica Correa

Universiade Paulista - UNIP

monica.grazieli@hotmail.com55(11) 5586-4000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026