Skip to content

Evaluating the Effect of Acupuncture on Temporomandibular Joint Disorder pain control

Evaluation of Acupuncture effects on painful Temporomandibular Disorder

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REBEC
Registry ID
RBR-10c447x8
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2024-08-21
Start date
2024-08-07
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Craniomandibular Disorder. Temporomandibular Joint Disorders. Temporomandibular Joint Disorder Syndrome

Interventions

Women over the age of 18 diagnosed with muscularTMD using the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) instrument. The inclusion criteria are: pain intensity of at least 4 on the v
MT1.388.585
MT1.388.585.520
D27.505.954.427.700.122.055
MT1.388.585.520.110

Sponsors

Núcleo de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento de Medicamentos
Lead Sponsor
Núcleo de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento de Medicamentos
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Women; over 18 years of age; diagnosed with painful Temporomandibular Dysfunction of the muscular or mixed type; who report pain of intensity at least 4 on the numerical pain scale (NDS); for at least 3 months

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: other orofacial pain; smokers; presence of gingivitis with spontaneous bleeding; periodontitis; oral lesions; diseases affecting the adrenal glands; pregnant and lactating women; use of glucocorticoids and medications and/or supplements that affect cortisol levels less than 3 months before inclusion in the study (anticonvulsants; tricyclic antidepressants and/or monoamine oxidase inhibitors; estrogen receptor antagonists; antifungals; progesterone antagonists; diuretics; opioid analgesics and immunosuppressants); total edentulousness and partial edentulousness with presence of free end; refusal to sign the informed consent form; physical or psychological alterations that prevent the use of the assessment instruments

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
At the end of the interventions (8 weeks), it is expected that there will be a decrease of at least 2 points in pain intensity as measured by the Numerical Pain Scale (NPS) and a decrease of at least 1 point in pain interference with work, daily and leisure activities as measured by the Pain Gradation Scale whose final score ranges from 0 to 6. The NPS and Pain Gradation Scale will also be used at the 3-month and 6-month post-intervention follow-up

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Sleep quality will be assessed using the Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Each of the 7 components of the PSQI ranges from 0-3: subjective quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, medication use and daily dysfunction. The sum of the 7 components ranges from 0-21. Higher scores indicate poorer sleep quality. A decrease in the total score is expected, indicating an improvement in sleep quality at the end of the interventions (8 weeks);Evaluate morning and evening salivary cortisol levels before and after the interventions (8 weeks). The levels considered normal are: less than 0.75 µg/ml for morning cortisol and less than 0.24 µg/ml for evening cortisol. Correlate with pain intensity, chronic pain classification, sleep quality, anxiety level, depression level, and mandibular disability;Depression is assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) scale, with scores ranging from 0 to 20. Higher scores indicate more severe depression. A decrease in PHQ-9 scores is expected at the end of the interventions (8 weeks).;Anxiety will be assessed using the GAD-7 (General Anxiety Disorder-7) instrument, whose scores range from 0 to 15. Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety. A decrease in GAD-7 scores is expected at the end of the interventions (8 weeks);Stress levels are assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) scale. Higher scores indicate higher levels of stress. A decrease in the score on this scale is expected at the end of the intervention (8 weeks);The level of somatization will be assessed using the PHQ-15 (Patient Health Questionnaire-15) scale. Higher scores indicate higher levels of somatization. A decrease in the PHQ-15 score is expected after the interventions (8 weeks);Mandibular disability is assessed using the 8-item Jaw Functional Limitation Scale (JFLS), which is part of Axis II of the DC/TMD (Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorder). An average score is calculated for all

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Public ContactErika Citó

Núcleo de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento de Medicamentos

Erikabcito@gmail.com+55 (85) 987068283

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REBEC (via WHO ICTRP)