Congenital Heart Disease
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention group (40 students) will be invited to attend asynchronous online lectures about pediatric cardiac critical care + synchronous online bi-weekly lectures based on active learning methodolo
Sponsors
Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
Escola de educação permanente do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Last year residents of pediatric cardiology or pediatric intensive care or neonatology; voluntarily willing to participate
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Refusal to participate; refusal to sign the informed consent
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Expected endpoint 1 is the comparison of knowledge progression throughout the course, between both groups. We hope to evaluate the progression difference within each module between both groups, using the percentual difference between pre and post-test scores, applying an appropriate statistical test according to normality distribution (paired t-student if normal). We expect to refute the null hypothesis and find a statistically significant difference, considered as p<0.05 | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Expected endpoint 2 is the comparison of final course scores between groups. The final score will be an average of all post-test scores. We will compare final scores applying an appropriate statistical test according to normality distribution (t-student test if normal). We expect to refute the null hypothesis and find a statistically significant difference, considered as p<0.05;Expected endpoint 3 is the comparison of satisfaction scores about the course, between both groups. We will evaluate satisfaction using a likert scale based on the NPS (Net Promoter Score). We will compare satisfaction scores applying an appropriate statistical test according to normality distribution (t-student test if normal). We expect to refute the null hypothesis and find a statistically significant difference, considered as p<0.05 ;Expected endpoint 4 is the comparison between usability scores for the learning management system, evaluated with the System Usability Scale. We will compare usability scores applying an appropriate statistical test according to normality distribution (t-student test if normal). We expect not to refute the null hypothesis, since the learning management system is the same for both groups, and find no statistically significant difference | — |
Countries
Brazil
Contacts
Public ContactCarolina Vieira de Campos
Instituto do coração da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
Outcome results
None listed