Skip to content

A phase III, randomised, multi-centre, double blind, parallel group, active comparator study to compare the efficacy and safety of SPD476 (mesalazine) 2.4g/day once daily (qd) versus Asacol® 1.6g/day twice daily (BID) in the maintenance of remission in patients with ulcerative colitis. - NA

A phase III, randomised, multi-centre, double blind, parallel group, active comparator study to compare the efficacy and safety of SPD476 (mesalazine) 2.4g/day once daily (qd) versus Asacol® 1.6g/day twice daily (BID) in the maintenance of remission in patients with ulcerative colitis. - NA

Status
Unknown
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REPEC
Registry ID
PER-112-07
Enrollment
16
Registered
2008-01-18
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-09-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Group 1 Type of group
SPD476 2.4 g / day administered 1 v / d for 6 months Group name:Group 2 Type of group
Asacol® 1.6 g / day administered 2 v / d for 6 months

Sponsors

Shire Pharmaceutical Development Ltd.,
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: • Adult subjects (> 18 years old) of both sexes. The participants must be postmenopausal women, surgically or biologically sterilized or have negative results in a urine pregnancy test in the selection and use an adequate contraceptive. • Subjects with a previous diagnosis of UC confirmed by histology, who are considered to be in remission 1 acute episode of UC (documented episode of increased frequency) of stools with rectal bleeding that forced to intensify the treatment of UC) in the last 12 months and> 2 acute episodes in his medical history

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: • Subjects with proctitis only in the most recent recurrence (degree of inflammation 2 mg / dL) have treatment contraindicated with 5-ASA compounds and will be excluded from the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Outcome name:Defined by a score <1 on endoscopy. The main analysis will compare the main efficacy variable between SPD476 and Asacol® in the population per protocol (PP). Measure:Percentage of subjects in endoscopic remission at month 6 in each treatment group Timepoints:month 6

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Outcome name:The time to endoscopic recurrence will be presented and compared using the Kaplan-Meier methodology. Measure:Time to endoscopic recurrence Timepoints:until endoscopic recurrence ; Outcome name:The score in the IDA-ECU and its components will be duly summarized at each relevant time point and by change with respect to the baseline value; it will be further compared between the treatment groups. Measure:Score in the IDA-ECU Timepoints:6 months ; Outcome name:The total score in the CASEII and its components will be duly summarized at each relevant time point and by change with respect to the base value; it will be further compared between the treatment groups. Measure:Quality of life Timepoints:6 months

Contacts

Public ContactLourdes Teresa Paz

ICON CLINICAL RESEARCH PERU S.A.

lourdes.paz@iconclinical.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REPEC (via WHO ICTRP)