Skip to content

MULTICENTRIC, DOUBLE-BLIND, FOUR-PARALLEL GROUP, RANDOMIZED STUDY TO INVESTIGATE THE RESPONSE DOSE OF MICAFUNGIN (FK463) COMPARED WITH FLUCONAZOLE, ADMINISTERED TO HIV-POSITIVE PATIENTS WITH CONFIRMED CANDIDIASIS ESOPHAGITIS

MULTICENTRIC, DOUBLE-BLIND, FOUR-PARALLEL GROUP, RANDOMIZED STUDY TO INVESTIGATE THE RESPONSE DOSE OF MICAFUNGIN (FK463) COMPARED WITH FLUCONAZOLE, ADMINISTERED TO HIV-POSITIVE PATIENTS WITH CONFIRMED CANDIDIASIS ESOPHAGITIS

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
REPEC
Registry ID
PER-031-02
Enrollment
18
Registered
2002-04-04
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-09-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

50mg/dia de FK463 Type of group
The study medication will be administered once a day in the form of an intravenous infusion of 100 ml for one hour. Group name:200mg / day of fluconazole Type of group
The study medication will be administered once a day in the form of an intravenous infusion of 100 ml for one hour.

Sponsors

FUJISAWAGMBH (ALEMANIA),
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The patient must have candidiasis esophagitis, with or without involvement of the oropharyngeal area, without typical signs, documented clinical symptoms and confirmed by endoscopy. A histological / cytological confirmation should be obtained by brushing and esophageal biopsy, the results of which may still be pending at the moment of enrolling the patient. Patient of both sexes older than 18 years. The patient should have veins that are sufficiently accessible to allow medication to be administered.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Evidence of liver disease. Pregnant or breast-feeding patient. Patient with significant renal disease. Patient with another opportunistic disease.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Outcome name:clinical evaluation, microbiological response, clinical response and relapse evaluation. Measure:grade 0 endoscopic evaluation at the end of therapy Timepoints:14 day

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Outcome name:Serious adverse effects, vital signs and clinically significant changes were evaluated. Measure:safety evaluation Timepoints:14 day

Countries

Brazil, Peru, South Africa, United Kindgdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: REPEC (via WHO ICTRP)