A Comparative analysis of Swiss ball balance training and conventional balance training to improve trunk control and mobility among individuals with sub-acute stroke

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

PACTR

Registry ID

PACTR202605730696438

Enrollment

Registered

2026-05-18

Start date

2026-06-15

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nervous System Diseases

Interventions

Swiss ball balance training SBBT

Conventional Balance Training CBT

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Stroke onset within 3 months prior to enrollment; 2. Willingness to participate in a 6 weeks study 3. Both right hemiplegic and left hemiplegic patients. 4. Male and female hemiplegic patients between the ages of 18 and 65 years 5. First ever unilateral stroke

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Cognitive impairment. 2. Uncontrolled hypertension (>180/120 mmHg) 3. Seizures. 4. Participation in other experimental rehabilitation studies.l

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Static balance and dynamic balance.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Mobility and gait	—

Countries

Zambia

Contacts

Public ContactBrian NKhoma

Physiotherapist

bnkhoma@gmail.com0979471360

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Sep 19, 2026