Skip to content

A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Suction Evacuation Ureteral Access Sheath versus Standard Ureteral Access Sheath in Flexible Ureteroscopy for Upper Urinary Tract Stones Lithotripsy.

A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Suction Evacuation Ureteral Access Sheath versus Standard Ureteral Access Sheath in Flexible Ureteroscopy for Upper Urinary Tract Stones Lithotripsy.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
PACTR
Registry ID
PACTR202605716600855
Enrollment
70
Registered
2026-05-25
Start date
2024-04-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Urological and Genital Diseases

Interventions

Suction Evacuation Ureteral Access Sheath FANS UAS
Standard Ureteral Access Sheath TUAS

Sponsors

Tanta University Faculty of Medicine
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with a solitary upper urinary tract stone (upper ureter or renal) =2 cm in maximal diameter, who were pre-stented, candidates for RIRS using FURS and laser lithotripsy.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: (a) multiple stones or bilateral ureteric stones; (b) persistent urinary tract infection; (c) congenital urinary tract malformations (horseshoe kidney, mal position of kidneys); (d) children less than 15 years old; (e) patients without stent prior to the procedure; and (f) pregnancy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
stone-free rate (SFR), assessed by non-contrast CTU one month after RIRS. Clinically insignificant residual fragments were defined as stone =2 mm, the widely accepted threshold on CT imaging

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1- operative time, measured from the start of visualizing cystoscopy to urethral catheter insertion. 2- complications occurring intraoperatively or within 30 days, classified according to the modified Clavien system. 3- Surgeon satisfaction was evaluated according to a 5-point Likert scale (5: excellent, 4: Good, 3: Satisfactory, 2: Poor, 1: Very poor). 4- Pain was evaluated on the first postoperative day using the visual analog scale (VAS). 5- Hospital stay in days. 6- If reintervention was scheduled within 30 days, a non contrast CT scan was performed 1–2 days prior to the procedure to reassess the residual fragment status, and the modality was also documented.

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Public ContactMohamed Safa

Assistant Lecturer of Urology

mohamedyoussefsafa@gmail.com+201067087374

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Sep 19, 2026