Skip to content

Comparison of Visual Prostate Symptom Score with the Arabic International Prostate Symptom Score in Assessing Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Egyptian Men; A Prospective study

Comparison of Visual Prostate Symptom Score with the Arabic International Prostate Symptom Score in Assessing Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Egyptian Men; A Prospective study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
PACTR
Registry ID
PACTR202605683037942
Enrollment
400
Registered
2026-05-22
Start date
2024-04-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Urological and Genital Diseases

Interventions

patients aged 40 years or older presenting with LUTS completed Arabic IPSS questionnaires.
patients aged 40 years or older presenting with LUTS completed VPSS questionnaires.

Sponsors

Tanta University Faculty of Medicine
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Male

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Male patients aged 40 years or older presenting with LUTS as their chief complaint were consecutively recruited.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: cognitive impairment, psychiatric disorders, visual impairment, illiteracy, bladder capacity less than 150 mL, underactive bladder, indwelling catheter or suprapubic cystostomy, active urinary tract infection, or voided volume less than 150 mL on uroflowmetry.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
was the strength of correlation between VPSS and IPSS total scores, quantified by Spearman's correlation coefficient (rs), and the degree of agreement between the two instruments assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and weighted kappa statistics for symptom severity categorization (mild, moderate, and severe). A priori thresholds were defined as rs = 0.60 for moderate correlation and weighted kappa = 0.61 for substantial agreement.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
(1) the proportion of patients requiring external assistance to complete each questionnaire; (2) mean completion time (minutes) for the VPSS versus IPSS; (3) patient-reported instrument preference when offered a direct choice between the two questionnaires; and (4) comparison of education level between patients who required assistance and those who completed the questionnaires independently.

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Public ContactAhmed Eissa

Lecturer

ahmed.essa@med.tanta.edu.eg+201110304666

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Sep 19, 2026