Skip to content

Comparing the Combined use of intramuscular carboprost and tourniquet or tourniquet alone in reducing blood loss during abdominal myomectomy.

Comparing intramuscular carboprost and tourniquet versus tourniquet alone in reducing blood loss during abdominal myomectomy.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
PACTR
Registry ID
PACTR202602858892247
Enrollment
110
Registered
2026-02-06
Start date
2026-02-02
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myomectomy for Uterine Myoma .

Interventions

carboprost Adminstration and Tourniquet Application
Tourniquet

Sponsors

Nelson Ampah
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Women diagnosed with symptomatic uterine fibroids requiring surgical intervention through abdominal myomectomy. 2. Patients with multiple or large fibroids (>5 cm), as these cases typically present with increased surgical complexity and blood loss, making them ideal for evaluating haemostatic interventions. 3. Patients with normal baseline haemoglobin levels (=10 g/dL) to minimize confounding effects of pre-existing anaemia.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Women with known bleeding disorders or coagulopathies, as these conditions independently affect perioperative blood loss. 2. Patients with prior uterine artery embolization (UAE) or previous uterine surgeries, which may alter vascularization and affect the surgical bleeding profile. 3. Women with severe anaemia (Hb < 10 g/dL) or those requiring preoperative transfusion, as their blood loss tolerance differs from the general study population. 4. Patients with contraindications to carboprost tromethamine use, such as a history of asthma or cardiovascular disease, due to the risk of adverse effects.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Women who receive combined intramuscular carboprost and a tourniquet may experience a significantly smaller drop in haemoglobin levels from preoperative to postoperative measurements compared to those who receive a tourniquet alone, indicating reduced intraoperative blood loss. Alternatively, there may be no significant difference in the change in haemoglobin levels between the two groups, suggesting that carboprost does not provide additional benefit in minimizing blood loss.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. The combination of intramuscular carboprost and a tourniquet may lead to a lower proportion of patients requiring blood transfusion, demonstrating its effectiveness in minimizing severe blood loss. Conversely, the need for transfusion may remain similar between both groups, which would indicate that carboprost does not significantly impact transfusion rates. 2. The combined use of intramuscular carboprost and tourniquet may contribute to a shorter surgical duration, as less time may be needed to achieve haemostasis. On the other hand, there may be no significant reduction in operative time between the two groups.

Countries

Ghana

Contacts

Public ContactRansford Frempong

Obstetrician Gynecologist

ranzyrf@yahoo.co.uk00233244295815

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Sep 19, 2026