Skip to content

Can Virtual Reality Help Stroke Patients Regain Strength, Balance, and Movement?

Effectiveness of Virtual Reality Based Rehabilitation on Motor Recovery Among Stroke Survivors in a Tertiary Health Institution in Benin City

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
PACTR
Registry ID
PACTR202602851104296
Enrollment
46
Registered
2026-02-26
Start date
2025-05-05
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nervous System Diseases

Interventions

Conventional Physiotherapy Intervention plus Virtual Reality

Sponsors

Zabdiel Uti
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Aged 18 to 65 years. Stroke survivors undergoing rehabilitation at UBTH. Presence of residual motor impairment (e.g., hemiparesis affecting the arm and/or leg). Medically stable and able to engage in exercise therapy Ability to give informed consent and willingness to participate in either VR or conventional therapy sessions for 8 weeks.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Severe cognitive or communication impairment (e.g., advanced dementia or expressive/receptive aphasia). Significant visual or sensory deficits (e.g., profound visual impairment, severe proprioceptive or vestibular disorders).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change in upper limb muscle strength of targeted muscle groups (shoulder flexors/extensors, elbow flexors/extensors, wrist flexors/extensors) on the affected side.;Change in lower limb muscle strength of targeted muscle groups (hip flexors/extensors, knee flexors/extensors, and ankle flexors/extensors) on the affected side. Medical Research Council Scale.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Upper limb muscular endurance on the affected side to measure change from baseline. Measurement: modified 30-second arm curl test (number of repetitions completed).;Lower limb muscular endurance on the affected side to measure change from baseline. Measurement: 30-second sit-to-stand test (number of stands).;Upper limb joint flexibility (range of motion) Description: Change from baseline in active range of motion (ROM) of targeted joints on the affected side. Measurement: Universal goniometer; ROM reported in degrees for each joint (shoulder flexion/extension, elbow flexion, and wrist flexion/extension).;Lower limb joint flexibility (range of motion) Description: Change from baseline in the active range of motion (ROM) of targeted joints on the affected side. Measurement instrument: Universal goniometer; ROM reported in degrees for each joint (hip flexion/extension, knee flexion, and ankle flexion/extension).;Upper-limb coordination Description: Change from baseline in upper-limb coordination of the affected side. Rapid Alternating Movement Test (forearm pronation–supination); number of repetitions completed within 30 seconds.;Lower-limb coordination Description: Change from baseline in lower-limb coordination of the affected side. Heel-to-Shin Test; number of successful repetitions performed within 30 seconds.;Balance Description: Change from baseline in standing and functional balance. Measurement instrument: Berg Balance Scale (BBS), total score (0–56).

Countries

Nigeria

Contacts

Public ContactZabdiel Uti Uti

Researcher

utizabdiel@gmail.com+2348136497282

Outcome results

None listed

Source: PACTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Sep 19, 2026